The Exodus

•August 17, 2016 • Comments Off on The Exodus

The Passover

Fig. 1 Orbits of Earth, Mars and proto-Venus between Mars’ geostationary encounters showing capture and release points.

Based on interpretations of the Rg Veda, Egyptian, Greek, and Roman myth plus the Bible, Cyclic Catastrophism claims that Mars was captured in the same geostationary orbit above Mt. Kailas, and released one hundred times. Each capture lasted ~14.4 years and each release ~15.6 years. Therefore each cycle took ~30 years.  These astronomical cycles governed all human ceremonial activities and archaeologically are noted by two calendars in every ancient culture, 360 and 365.25 days per year. The slower  rotation taking place due to the mass moment of Mars in geostationary orbit. The capture period was called the ‘inundation’ in Egypt because tidal effect of Mars drew the clear Nile waters across Eastern Egypt for the entire 14.4 years, increasing the production of crops. Modern day Egyptologists interpret the ‘inundation’ as referring to the yearly increase in the Nile flow.

The most spectacular event in each cycle was the release of the worn-out Mars from its geostationary orbit. This occurred on the vernal equinox of the fourteenth year of its capture at which date proto-Venus’ orbit attained aphelion and inferior conjunction relative to the Earth-Mars pair (Figure). At the same time the Moon and Sun were closely aligned. Based on the anticipation of this event the Egyptians scheduled the elaborate Heb Sed Festivals, or Festival of the tail, constructing elaborate structures and preparing numerous feasts, primarily to celebrate the pharaohs 30-year reign.  The ‘tail’ referred to the comet-like tail of proto-Venus which came closest to the Earth-Mars pair at this date. Originally, each pharaoh’s reign was associated with a 30-year cycle of capture and release of Mars and at the end of the festival he was sacrificed and mummified in preparation for: (a) his ritual ascent to the duat on Mars; (b) proceeding through its interior (amenta); and (c) mounting the solid iron core (Hathor) which then was blasted from Mars like a spaceship imagined to carry the pharaoh’s soul ‘to the gods’ (see post).

The solid iron core first appeared through the Valles Marineris as the ‘eye of Horus’ but then exited Mars, zoomed low around the Earth to the East, boosting its speed while the outer shell of Mars, with a huge 4,000 km wide flaming gash,  drifted to the west, passing over the Middle East. Egyptian myth tells that it took eight days for the solid core to catch up to the outer shell as it drifted away from the Earth.  This repeating ‘passing over’ the Middle East was the origin of the Jewish pesach, or passover festival which is still celebrated for eight days by Chasidic Jews. It is also celebrated in the Rg Veda as the festival of ‘nine nights’.

The Exodus

Understanding the Exodus requires a little more information. Upon each capture of Mars in its geostationary orbit above Mt. Kailas, in the TransHimalayas, its tidal effect drew waters form all across the Eastern Hemisphere toward the Himalayas to an altitude of 5,000 meters, surrounding the highest Himalayas. This caused a day of flooding across Northern Egypt and in the Levant as the Mediterranean and Red Seas  were emptied.  This 30-year flood was the reason that the Egyptians built the pyramids and the other cultures in the Levant lived on tells. Therefore 14.4 years later, at each release of Mars, there was no water in the Red Sea, thus it was referred to as the ‘wilderness’ in the Bible. This had happened some seventy-five times before the Exodus and everyone in the area knew the physical events that occurred each time. At the same time, the Egyptians were celebrating the Heb Sed festival, so it was the perfect time for the Jews to cross the ‘Red Sea’ wilderness.  The outer shell of Mars with the flaming 4,000 km gap in the side was the “pillar of cloud” in the day and the “pillar of fire” at night that guided Moses and the Jews, which was at first before them and as it continued to drift to the West moved between them and the pursuing Egyptian army.

When the solid iron core of Mars exited the planet, it looped close to the Earth moving East. Although it was not as massive as the outer shell of Mars it zoomed much closer to the Earth, therefore half of the water in the 5,000 meter high tidal bulge around the Himalayas flowed east and the other half flowed west with Mars. The Lord told Moses exactly when to cross the wilderness, and after they did the waters coming back to the emptied Mediterranean and Red Seas converged in the Red Sea drowning the pursuing Egyptian Army and preventing any pursuit for the next 15.6 years.

The Date of the Exodus

The exact date of the Exodus and the name of the Egyptian pharaoh at the time,  has never been proven, but cyclic catastrophism may help resolve the date. Simplistically, each complete cycle took 30-years, but based on the Vishnu Purana, which states that “the seven holy rishis lived 3030 years” gives 30.3-years per cycle. Given that the last (the one-hundredth) cycle ended in 687 BC, the Exodus had to have been a multiple of 30.3 years earlier than 687. Assuming this occurred 25 cycles prior to 687 produces a date of 1444.5 which is very close to the popular date 1446.

Exodus 20:2  I am the LORD thy God, which have brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage.

Cyclic Catastrophism Predicts Martian Drain Pipe

•September 25, 2013 • 4 Comments

drainpipeCyclic Catastrophism, the subject of this blog site, is unique because it explains the origin of every feature observed on Mars by NASA probes based on ancient texts and art.  But it also predicts the most unique feature on Mars – one currently hiding under the northern icecap, which cannot be explained by any currently accepted astrophysical process.  The ancient texts make clear that the formerly living planet, priori-Mars, was captured in a geostationary (44,400 km) orbit of the Earth for a period of 14.4 years and then released into an orbit of the Sun for 15.6 years and that this 30-year cycle was repeated one hundred times, resulting in the loss of all its soil, water, atmosphere and biosphere to the Earth, between 3687 and 687 BC.

The Column of Smoke and Fire

Because of the pronounced bulges on its surface, now called the Tharsis Bulge and its antipode (since settled isostatically), the spin axis (the north pole) of the lithosphere of Mars was forced to remain oriented toward the Earth while in geosynchronous orbit.  Upon each capture, the tidal force of the Earth first drew all the water in the northern hemisphere of Mars toward its north pole (outflow channels), forming the Oceanus Borealis (northern ocean). Over a period of months, the same tidal force melted subsurface rock and drew it to the surface where it formed an island still present, rising 3 km above its north pole. The single most unique planetary feature then rose from the center of the island, an enormous lava fountain, was drawn down toward the Earth and, as a result of the formation of vertical lava tubes, attained a height of over 2000 km.  This column was continually fed by a stream of lava flowing through a volcanic vent which extended deeper and deeper inside the planet during each capture. This glowing, flaming feature was the primary deity in every culture on Earth between 3687 and 687 BC: the Vedic Purusha, the Hindu Brahma, the Greek Zeus and the Egyptian Osiris. It was also called the ‘tree of life’, ‘the lotus that grew from the navel of Vishnu’, the Egyptian tuat or djed pillar, the ‘axis mundi’ (axis of the worlds), the upside-down tree of the shamans, the ‘column of smoke and fire’, and was the inspiration for the totem poles of the Amerind peoples. It was also the Greek Atlas, imagined to prevent the enormous planet, stationary in the heavens some 530 times the area of the full Moon, from falling to the Earth.

The Escapes of Priori-Mars

But after 14.4 years in this geostationary orbit priori-Mars would amazingly escape into an orbit of the Sun for 15.6 years by a process that no astrophysicist today has ever imagined, involving the hardened lava column – more precisely the deep volcanic vent from which it arose.  The escape occurred when the alignment of the Sun, Moon (at a vernal equinox), proto-Venus (at inferior conjunction and aphelion) combined with the Earth to exert a tidal effect that convulsed Mars’ interior, simultaneously causing the great hardened lava column to collapse and the northern ocean to rise above the island and rush down into the volcanic vent, flowing all the way into its liquid outer core where it flashed to steam creating an enormous pressure that forced the solid core of the planet, known as Hathor, Hermes, Sarama and Mercury out through the enormous fault on the equator of Mars, known as the Valles Marineris.

Because priori-Mars’ north pole remained facing the Earth during these capture periods, no humans could ever see its south pole. This resulted in the ancient Egyptian’s theistic understanding of the north and south poles. Because they saw the northern ocean drain into the vent on the northern island at the end of each geostationary orbit period when proto-Venus approached, they realized that this ‘tunnel’ was an entrance into the Amenta (underworld).  The land which rose above the northern ocean (the duat), was called the ‘land of Horus‘ and everything beneath that land belonged to Sut (Set) his arch enemy. Thus the volcanic vent which led to the ‘the land of Sut‘ (Amenta or underworld) was called the ‘tunnel of Sut‘, this mirror image of the hardened lava column, was seen as the Martian south pole.  Over a hundred years ago, the famous Egyptologist Gerrald Massey understood and translated the following hieroglyphic text perfectly – except that no one, even to this day, understands that the text was not referring to ‘our Earth’, but another body visible in the heavens:

It is certain that Sut went down south to some sort of nether-world, and so became the power of darkness in Amenta, when our earth had been completely hollowed out by Ptah, and Amenta below became the south to the circumpolar paradise in the celestial north. The ancient Egyptians had no antipodes on the outside of the earth. Amenta in the nether-world was their antipode. Their two poles were celestial and sub-terrestrial. The north pole was at the summit of the mount. The south pole was in the root-land of the earth below. The Ritual describes the ways of darkness in the entrance to the tuat [duat] as the tunnels of Sut, which tends to show that a way to the nether-world was made by Sut when his star and standing-ground went under in the abyss of the beginning in the south, where the Egyptians localized the tuat or entrance to the under-world, which was the place of egress for the life that came into the world by water from “the recesses of the south”.

The fact that the Egyptians could not see the actual antipode of the ‘earth’, reinforced the idea that the passage was referring to the our Earth on which they lived, and that the deity Ptah had hollowed it out.  But Massey reveals his doubt when he states “The Ritual  … tends to show a way … “. This part of the passage is actually describing the events at the expulsion of the solid core. ” … when his star and [the] standing ground went under the abyss … ” describes the passing of proto-Venus (Sut’s star) behind, i.e. becoming aligned with priori-Mars, and as a result of its added (indirect) tidal effect, the northern island (the duat or standing ground) went under the northern ocean, the Nun, ” …  the abyss of the beginning… ” (because this ocean formed at the beginning of each encounter).  Of course the occluded proto-Venus also appeared to be under the ocean, at least metaphorically.  The Rg Veda describes the same event stating ” … Agni (proto-Venus) was concealed in the waters … “. The ultimate result of the the abyss waters draining into the interior and ejecting the solid core was that each time this happened it forced priori-Mars to leave the vicinity of the Earth – which was the reason that Sut was considered Horus‘ enemy.  This is a specific form of the very common myth that  the ‘home god’ was forced to leave the earth and join combat with the ‘intruder god’.

Mercury – priori-Mars Solid Iron Core

At the end of each encounter the glowing solid core first protruded through the Valles Marineris. The Egyptians called it the ‘eye of Horus‘, but when it continued out into space as an independent body and zoomed low around the Earth to the East, they called it Hathor. This sling-shot maneuver around the Earth, allowed the solid core to catch up to the outer shell in only eight days as it drifted away from the Earth to the west, and reentered the open gash “cleaving its firmament”.  They recombined completely in the next 15.6 years, while orbiting the Sun.  The re-formed priori-Mars was subsequently recaptured in a geostationary orbit of the Earth at Nov. 1st , continuing the 30-year cycle which was repeated for 3,000 years, as proven by the fact that every Egyptian dynasty wrote of these events.

The Drain Pipe on Mars

drainpipe

O marks the location of the Drain Pipe at the North pole of Mars, filled with ice extending deep into its core.

Upon the last separation of Mars’ solid core (687 BC), it failed to reconnect with the outer shell, and was deflected into the inner solar system where it ‘cavorted with Venus’ for a few hundred years before both bodies settled into their current orbits. The Greek name for the former solid core was Hermes, but of particular interest today, its Roman name was Mercury, the name now used universally for the sulfur-coated solid iron ‘planet’ closest to the Sun. At the same time the laws of conservation of angular momentum and energy dictated the outer shell, Mars, collapse in on itself and drift out into its current orbit.  With most of its atmosphere and water having been lost to the Earth between 3687 and 687 BC, the last of the water on priori-Mars, which was still swirling down through the vent drain pipe into its core, froze in the form we see today, the whirlpool-shaped northern polar ice deposit.  The fact that the whirlpool flows up and over the 3 km high northern island, in itself corroborates Cyclic Catastrophism – another feature to which NASA scientists have paid little attention. But they will not be able to ignore the most unique feature which Cyclic Catastrophism predicts here – a long narrow column of ice that descends from the north pole, at the very center of the whirlpool, deep into the core of Mars. I have marked its position to help NASA find it.

 

This is the geologist … and this the mathematician, Gentlemen, to you the first honors always! Your facts are useful, and yet they are not my dwelling, I but enter by them to an area of my dwelling.

Walt Whitman

 

Juno Above the Great Red Spot (Updated)

•August 1, 2017 • Comments Off on Juno Above the Great Red Spot (Updated)

Fig. 1 Juno passing above the GRS and the hot-spot, should encounter slower scattered helium ions that are detectable by the JEDI instrument.

On July 12, 2017 Juno passed directly over the Great Red Spot (GRS) and we are told that all sensors were operating. Because of the unique significance of the GRS in the Methane Gas Hydrate model of Jupiter presented in this blog site, we are anticipating some of the findings in this post.  A fusion reaction on the surface of Jupiter, ~ 700 km below the cloud tops produces an intense ‘tornado’ (Coriolis) of 1030 helium ions (3He+), which blast out of the GRS every second. They collide with the inner radiation belt, composed of the same helium ions at the O’Donaghue hot-spot, adding ions and imparting angular momentum of the rapidly spinning Jupiter to the belt. The high kinetic energy helium ions (>20,000km/sec) which penetrate the hot-spot are captured in the magnetic field generated by what is presently known as the  ‘inner radiation belt’ and are carried helically toward the magnetic poles, producing the constant auroral ovals.

Amazingly, the kinetic energy of the invisible helium ions which dominate the Jupiter system, produces the excess luminosity, the multiple zonal wind bands (vortices) and the largest magnetosphere in the solar system. These helium ions have not been detected for three reasons (1) the helium ions are moving too fast to be detected by the JEDI SSD-TOF instrument; (2) All of the ions, newly produced by this reaction are moving at the same velocity; (3) they are quickly lost from the system in < 30 sec and continuously replaced by new ones with the same velocity. Due to the small (6 cm) size of its the JEDI cavity it cannot measure Time Of Flight of the helium ions the time of flight necessary to identify them. They are not radioactive, do not react chemically and do not radiate as a result of collisions, either at the O’Donaghue hot spot or where they strike the atmosphere creating the auroral ovals. However, storms of fast helium ions were detected by energetic particle detectors on Ulysses, Cassini, Galileo orbiter and probe at several AU from the Jupiter system. Because these ions are continuously produced at the rate of 1030/s, many are continuously being lost, either thru returns to Jupiter’s atmosphere or to space.

Fig.2 Artist’s impression of Hot Spot above Jupiter’s GRS where helium ions collide with inner radiation belt. (O’Donaghue)

What is required is a process which reduces the velocities of a large enough sample of these helium ions within Juno’s orbit for the JEDI detector to identify them. The best chance to do this is on PJ7 above the hot-spot. Since 1030 ions per second are impacting the even more concentrated ion beam which circles the planet, where there must be sufficient collisions which scatter and produce  a distribution of velocities within the JEDI range. The only problem which might arise is that the JEDI TOF feature has been turned off during the 20 minute period of closest approach to avoid damage by the currently unknown high energy particles in the inner radiation belt.

Fig. 3 Juno crossing fusion crater

In the MGH model, there is a huge crater or palimpsest, partially filled in by water ice, centered 50,000 km to the east of the GRS, on the fusion reaction. As Juno makes the GRS pass it will detect the northern and southern edges of this impact crater roughly equal distances north and south of the GRS. This crater will be detected by both the Radio Science (gravity) and MAG (magnetic field) systems. As mentioned in previous posts, both systems are seeing anomalies from earlier impacts, but have as yet not made the connection, since the mindset of the entire Juno team remains on the old ‘gas giant’ hypothesis.

The six passive MWR radiometers will undoubtedly detect the hot-spot, but as on all prior science passes, they will interpret the signal in each wavelength channel as coming from different depths, instead of realizing that all channels are seeing the same heat source.

 

Jupiter’s ‘Synchrotron’ Radiation

•July 29, 2017 • Comments Off on Jupiter’s ‘Synchrotron’ Radiation
Jupiter Radiation Belts

Fig. 1 Cassini scans of Jupiter’s inner radiation belt

“Synchrotron radiation is the electromagnetic radiation emitted when charged particles are accelerated radially, i.e., when they are subject to an acceleration perpendicular to their velocity (a ⊥ v). It is produced, for example, in synchrotrons using bending magnets, undulators and/or wigglers. If the particle is non-relativistic, then the emission is called cyclotron emission.” (1)
Radiation from Jupiter’s inner radiation belt was measured by the Cassini probe on 2-3 January 2001 when on its way to Saturn (Figure 1). The horizontally polarized radiation scans are shown on the left and vertically polarized scans, above and below the belt, are shown on the right. The horizontally polarized radiation is more powerful, but the intensity of both are very low – each horizontal/vertical pair of images shown in Figure 1 required a one hour scan across the disk of Jupiter. In the MGH hypothesis these are both the result of unidirectional flows of intense (1030/sec), energetic (20,000 km/s) helium ions. At this velocity a helium ion travels from the fusion source, 700 km below the cloud-tops, through the GRS and once completely around the planet in 15 seconds.

Syncrotron_radiation_energy_flux

Fig. 2 Radiation patterns (A) Non-relativistic cyclotron and (B) Relativistic synchotron particles.

This was interpreted in 2002 as synchrotron radiation due to ultra-relativistic electrons with energies > 50 MeV. (2) The models constructed to explain the ultra-relativistic radiation (γ>>1) assumed the radiation detected was only that beamed in the direction of motion of the particles, as shown in (B) on the right in Figure 2. (3) Since the radiation from both the east and west of Jupiter are almost equally powerful, this assumption implied a ‘belief’ that the electrons are moving both prograde and retrograde in keeping with the analogy of the Earth’s Van Allen belts.
Controverting the above view, recent Juno JEDI measurements have determined that the ratio of energetic particles to ions near the inner radiation belt is much less than 1, indicating that most of the particles are ions, not electrons. (4) Only protons and heavier ions such as sulfur and oxygen were identified by Solid State Detector-Time-Of-Flight coincidence measurements, but no high energy helium ions, which we propose dominate the beam, because no JEDI TOF measurements were attempted within 20 minutes of closest approach to insure the health and safety of the instrument. The measured 90 degree pitch angles of the ions were interpreted as due to ‘equatorial mirroring’- thus assuming bidirectional velocities of the ions, prograde and retrograde, again, as in the Van Allen belts of Earth. Noting the previously determined decline of ion intensities immediately planetward of Io’s orbit (6 RJ), the authors attempt to explain the obvious question of the origin of the ions in the inner radiation belt, between 1.4 and 1.2 RJ suggesting a process of stripping of neutral atoms.

Given the inner radiation belt comprises fast helium ions circulating exclusively prograde, raises the question of the origin of the supposed synchrotron radiation, discussed above. The power of the radiation is given by:


Thus the power radiated by the ion beam would be reduced by their mass ratios (e/He)4 =(1/8000)4 -> 2.44 X10-16 but scaled by their energy, ~ 104 MeV and their greater numbers 1031.

Cyclotron Radiation
However, if as proposed herein, the helium ions all circle Jupiter prograde at 20,000 km/s, a completely different situation would attain. This velocity results in a Lorentz factor essentially 1 (non-relativistic) meaning that the beaming assumed for the electron model would not be a factor for the proposed ion beam. Thus, the angular distribution of this cyclotron radiation would be similar to that shown in Figure 2 (A), with radiation in all azimuth directions but strongest when the angle between velocity and acceleration is +/- 90 degrees, that is, from the zones to both the west and east of Jupiter. This is exactly where the measured radiation is strongest (Figure 1). Thus, the proposed unidirectional ion beam produces the radiation both on the west and east sides of Jupiter. Assuming radiation was continuously received from all ions scanned by Cassini would greatly increase the total number of ions relative to electrons contributing to the image. The helium ion inner radiation belt also explains the east-west asymmetry of the radiation shown in Figure 1, which is due to the greater density of ions directly above the Great Red Spot, where they collide with the ion beam, as shown in Figure 1 of a previous post. The vertically polarized radiation, on the right side of in Figure 1 is radiation from the helium ions which are flowing to the poles, consistent with the MGH hypothesis. It is not as powerful as the main belt, because fewer helium ions follow that path. The vertically polarized sources in Figure 1 are smeared due to the horizontal scanning process and where superimposed on the disk of Jupiter are removed. The thermal radiation from the disk of Jupiter is much stronger than from the belts, so it is subtracted from the observed radiation signal, leaving the observed disk of Jupiter black in most scans.

More Juno Information

•July 17, 2017 • Comments Off on More Juno Information

Fig.1 A vortex of helium ions exiting the great Red Spot, striking the circulating plasma cloud, Currently called the inner radiation belt,

This post is a supplement to “What Juno is Telling Us” and Jupiter’s Auroras.  The JEDI detector has found no particle flows over the poles which could be the cause of the auroras. This is because the current orbit passes too high above the poles, a distance above the planet from 2 to 6 Jupiter radii. Based on the current magnetic field models Juno should be encountering the magnetic field lines that form the auroral ovals.  But these models are based on measurements of the Earth’s field, which is generated deep in the interior. In the Cyclic Catastrophism model, shown in Figure 1, Jupiter’s magnetic field is nothing like the Earth’s. The magnetic field of Jupiter is generated by an enormous flow of helium ions, positively charged particles, orbiting the planet, at 1.4 Jupiter radii. 1029 of these helium ions per second are produced in a fusion reaction p + d -> 3He+ + γ  on the surface of Jupiter and are all moving at the same high velocity ~24,000 km/sec. They spin in a tight vortex due to the Coriolis effect and exit the cloud-tops producing the counter-clockwise spinning Great Red Spot, then colliding with and adding to the stream of helium ions orbiting the planet. By this process they add the angular momentum of the planet to the stream. Helium ions are known to be completely stable, testified by the fact that they have been used to enhance MRIs of lungs because they give stronger signals. This same attribute means that they do not radiate, and cannot be detected by any Juno instrument..

Fig.2. Jupiter’s Inner Radiation Belt (red & yellow.

Synchrotron radiation from the spinning, vortical flow of the fast, circulating helium ions was measured by the Cassini probe on its way to Saturn and it became designated the ‘inner radiation belt’. This decimetric synchrotron radiation has been interpreted as due to ultra- relativistic electrons (Bolton, Janssen et al), more recently the JEDI data has shown that it comprises ions, not electrons (Kollmann et al), but JEDI cannot specifically detect these helium ions because they are all moving too fast for the Time of Flight measurement required to identify them. This is inconceivable to astronomers, because any non-nuclear sources would produce particles with a range of velocities, so some of each kind should be detectable. Some scientists understand that the particles in the inner radiation belt are all moving in the same direction, the direction of Jupiter’s rotation, and wisely question how the angular

Fig. 3 JEDI data near the inner radiation belt, offset from predicted latitude due to tilt of the plasma cloud relative to equator (Kollmann)

momentum of the planet is being transferred to the ions (Bagenal), indeed where do all the ions come from?  Even more recently, the authors of the paper that showed that the inner belt comprises only ions, believe that the ions are bouncing back and forth (equatorial mirroring) and not unidirectional.

As for the auroral ovals, most scientists cling to the auroras of the Earth for an explanation. This leads to the concept that electrons are coming into the polar region from all different directions (longitudes). But this could not form the perfect continuous ovals. Cyclic Catastrophism explains that a portion of the tornado of helium ions exiting through the Great Red Spot, penetrate the circulating ion cloud and once past it are captured in the magnetic field where, depending on the direction of their velocity vectors, some are captured helically and spiral as vortices to the north and south poles (Figure 1). These particles are still moving at the same velocities and that is why they form the ovals impacting some 16 degrees from the pole. They are thought to produce the auroras only by ionizing various gases in the atmosphere of Jupiter, but since much of the light comes from methane, the implication is that they may be blasting the methane right out of the solid Methane Gas Hydrate surface of the planet. Because the vortices of helium ions in the circulating plasma cloud and the auroral ovals originate considerably south of the equator, at the latitude of the Great Red Spot, the entire magnetic configuration of the planet is shifted. This shows up in the elongated, non circular shape of the northern oval, called a magnetic field anomaly in the literature.

Currently, not a single ‘scientist’ in the world understands that Jupiter’s Inner Radiation Belt is the source of the largest magnetosphere in the solar system, let alone that it comprises relativistic helium ions. How many more years must the world wait to be taught the true nature of the solar system?

(Prov 25:2 KJV) It is the glory of God to conceal a thing: but the honour of kings is to search out a matter.

(1 Cor 1:19-20 KJV) For it is written, I will destroy the wisdom of the wise, and will bring to nothing the
understanding of the prudent. Where is the wise? where is the scribe? where is the disputer of this world? hath not God
made foolish the wisdom of this world?

(1 Cor 2:6-7 NIV) We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or
the rules of this age, who are coming to nought. No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom that has been hidden and that
God destined for our glory before time began.

Venus – A Young Earth

•July 8, 2017 • Comments Off on Venus – A Young Earth

For complete paper click here.

Overwhelming physical evidence has been present for thirty-seven years that Venus is a hot new planet, born from an impact on the solid, highly deuterated, methane gas hydrate Jupiter 6,000 years BP. As explained in my previous post, impacts of large bodies on Jupiter trigger enormous nuclear fusion explosions which eject the full range of atoms in their known relative abundances, forming the terrestrial planets. Due to the great heat of these explosive ejections the atoms are reduced to a plasma comprising electrons, protons and neutrons, from which similar abundances quickly reformed, but with the nuclear decay clocks of radioactive isotopes reset to zero. For example, the radiogenic isotope 40Ar and the primordial 36Ar and 38Ar are present in the atmosphere of Venus in approximately equal amounts, whereas on Earth 40Ar is 300 times more abundant than the primordial isotopes. The large amount of 40Ar on Earth is due to the decay of potassium (40K) with half-life of 1.248 billion years since the formation of the Earth, 3.9 billion years Before the Present (BP). This ratio favors the recent primordial origin of proto-Venus, since there has been little time for the 40K on Venus to decay. In fact, most of the 40Ar on Venus was probably captured from Mars and the Earth during encounters which circularized its orbit.

Also, the hydrogen isotope ratio (D/H) on Venus is 150 times the terrestrial value, including the hydrogen in the oceans. Interestingly, cosmologists believe that the amount of deuterium present in the universe was formed in the Big Bang. But this hypothesis assumes that there were no post-Big Bang processes that could produce significant amounts of deuterium. The explosion, or Little Bang, out of which Venus was born was exactly that – a post-Big Bang event, as were those from which Mars and Earth were born. Thus, the deuterium present today has little to tell us about the initial conditions of the universe.

Venus today demonstrates that the heavy elements quickly condensed to form what will become the mantle of a complete terrestrial planet. Its current near circular orbit is the result of multiple close encounters with Mars and Earth, which raised the Tharsis Bulge and the Himalayas, resulting in the uplifting of Venus’ ‘continents’ Aphrodite and Ishtar Terra, which display no volcanic calderas. Its interior is completely molten with a thin basalt layer less than two kilometers thick floating on top, evidenced by its lack of rotation. Proto-Venus’ enormous internal heat is manifested by raw incandescent lava, > 2000º C, lying in myriads of cracks in the surface, fleeting views of which by the Pioneer Venus Large Probe Infrared Radiometer (LIR) produced high intensity erratic signals dismissed as window heater faults. If a camera had been used, the origin would have been immediately recognized. The molten interior, of course, precludes any magnetic field.

Up-welling vs down-welling radiation measurements from five independent Pioneer Venus probes all agree that proto-Venus is radiating 20 watts per square meter, 250 times more energy than the Earth. Integral to the cooling process, the primary transfer of heat is from the surface to the lower cloud layer, accomplished by the high velocity jetting of sulfur gases from more than one million ‘small domes’ directly to 48 km altitude where S8 crystalizes in three forms, allotropes, which comprise the lower cloud layer. This unique, 2 km thick, roiling, mixed-phase stratiform cloud layer is the most ubiquitous atmospheric feature on the planet. Sulfur compounds raining back onto the surface evaporate, controlling the surface temperature to just above the boiling point of sulfur.

The massive lower atmosphere, primarily sulfur molecules, SN, and carbon sulfide, CS, currently mistaken for CO2, capped by the lower cloud layer is the source of the high surface pressure, 92 bars. Temperature vs pressure for the descent of four Pioneer Venus probes in completely different regions of the planet agreed to within two degrees. It comprises a mass-flow environment with a different pressure versus altitude relationship than the upper atmosphere, unlike anything possible on an ancient planet with a well-mixed atmosphere. Failure to understand this was demonstrated when the trajectory of the dying Magellan probe experienced an atmospheric density twice that calculated assuming a hydrostatic pressure profile based on the Venus’ surface pressure and a composition of carbon dioxide. This layer will settle to the surface of the planet as it cools, adding to the existing mantle.

The temperature and pressure immediately above the lower cloud layer are similar to those at the surface of the Earth. The volatile elements currently found above the lower cloud layer represent a tiny fraction of the total produced by the 6,000 year (BP) impact explosion on Jupiter, the remainder of which orbit invisibly in the inner solar system awaiting capture. These will form the lithosphere, crust, oceans, atmosphere, flora and fauna of a new terrestrial planet. Loosely bound bodies composed primarily of water have been observed falling into the upper atmosphere of the Earth at the rate of thousands per day by the UV cameras on the NASA Polar satellite, but the scientists who discovered them have been ostracized by uniformitarian scientists who fail to understand that the solar system has been completely changed in the last 6,000 years.

A relatively simple, inexpensive, mission to verify this hypothesis is proposed. Two small probes, for redundancy, would be released from an orbiter (or even a flyby), each carrying visible light cameras which would photograph the surface of Venus once they descend below the opaque lower cloud layer and the red haze (CS crystals) to ~30 km altitude, where temperature and pressure are not severe. These photographs will reveal incandescent lava in surface cracks detected by the Pioneer Venus Large Probe Interferometer (LIR) and rejected. Another camera would be used to photograph microscopic images of sulfur crystals collected on glass plates as the probes fell through the lower cloud layer. The images would be transmitted to the bus and back to the Earth.

 

In the year 687 BC the Lord finished his work of creating a new Earth, and the planets Mars, Mercury and Venus, which He had used to do this, termed sinning angels, were sent to Tartarus, places of restraint, their current orbits, so they would not come close to the Earth again. This was announced through the prophet Isaiah who lived at this time.

Isaiah 65: 17-18  For, behold, I create new heavens and a new earth: and the former shall not be remembered, nor come into mind. But be ye glad and rejoice for ever in that which I create.

What Juno is Telling Us

•June 20, 2017 • Comments Off on What Juno is Telling Us

Fig. 1 The expanded incandescent Jupiter and the plume, known as Juno

The Cyclic Catastrophism Hypothesis

Ancient myths all begin with the creation of Venus out of Jupiter as Aditi (Rigveda), Osiris (Egyptian), Pallas Athene (Greek), Minerva and Venus (Roman) and  Quetzalcoatl (Mayan, Mesoamerican). The impact on Jupiter out of which proto-Venus was born, was seen by every creature on Earth some 6,000 years BP because the entire Earth’cried out’. The implications of this single event are: (1) The impact generated an enormous pulse of gravitation radiation that effected the Earth and the reflection of that energy from local dust is what is currently thought to be the CMB; (2) Jupiter is a solid low density, planet comprising the currently accepted solar system elemental abundances; (3) The terrestrial planets were each born on out of similar impacts on Jupiter and each has a unique age; (4) The original solar system comprised only the giant planets; (5) The currently unexplained excess luminosity of Jupiter and the high temperature of Venus’ surface 872 F (467 C) are the result of this impact.

The original solar system comprised only the giant planets which incorporated greatly enhanced concentrations of deuterium. Deuterium enhancements of 1010 observed in Large Dark Nebulae (LDN) and heavy elements detected by Galileo (C, O, S, Ar, Kr and Xe) suggest the giant planets in the solar system accreted slow and cold (20º K) from snowflakes and dust at their current orbits, forming frozen, highly deuterated Methane Gas Hydrate bodies (MGH), together comprising > 300 earth masses of water. Jupiter incorporates the heavy elements as dust grains, which are uniformly distributed throughout the solid planet resulting in Jupiter’s high density, 1.33, compared with pure MGH, 0.9 g/cm3. A recent (6,000 years BP) high energy impact on Jupiter triggered a massive nuclear fusion explosion of the local deuterium, which ejected proto-Venus plus the Galilean moons. The impact also expanded the incandescent atmosphere of Jupiter tenfold, initiating a continuous fusion reaction in the impact crater. A hot plasma plume from this reaction, named Juno in Roman myth, originally extended 2 x 106 km from the impact site at 22 ºS Latitude, beyond Callisto, rotating rapidly with Jupiter. It slowly diminished over ~ 5000 years, sweeping over the Galilean moons every eight or nine hours, resulting in the higher densities and temperatures of the inner Galilean moons. The longevity of the plume confirms the high deuterium content of our giant planets, a feature observed in a small number of Large Dark Nebula such as 1689N (Roueff).

The fusion reaction on the surface of Jupiter, some 700 km below the cloud-tops, has diminished to the lowest temperature reaction known: d + p →3He+ + γ. The kinetic energy of the helium ions produced by this reaction is producing Jupiter’s atmospheric temperature excess and its multiple zonal wind bands – actually vortices constrained below by the solid MGH surface. The reaction is generating 1030 relativistic helium ions per second with velocities >20,000 km/s, which rise in a hot vortex, due to the powerful Coriolis effect. It is swept west below the clouds some 50,000 km due to the rapid rotation of Jupiter, exiting the atmosphere through the Great Red Spot along with the standard solar system abundances of heavy elements which are continuously being released from the MGH by the heat of the fusion reaction. Although at 22 º S Lat. this constant momentum exchange results in a hot surface equatorial wind superrotation sensed by the MWR, but currently misinterpreted as a ‘pancake’ layer of ammonia in the interior of a ‘gas giant’.

A ‘tornado’ of helium ions exits through the Great Red Spot, impacts the helium ion plasma cloud that orbits Jupiter (prograde), currently known only as the inner radiation belt, imparting the angular momentum of the rapidly rotating Jupiter and adding ions to replace those being lost to space. The massive number of relativistic helium ions in the plasma cloud constitutes an electric current of 150 million amperes which creates Jupiter’s magnetic field. It is tilted relative to the equator because the plasma cloud originates from the Great Red Spot at 22⁰ S Latitude. The positively charged cloud external to Jupiter generates its powerful magnetosphere unobstructed by the solid planet, as in the magnetic field of the Earth. Jupiter’s magnetic field is opposite the field of the Earth, with north magnetic field corresponding to north geographic pole due to the prograde circulation of the positive ions in the cloud.

The highly energetic helium ions (>20,000 km/s) exiting from the GRS which pass through the plasma cloud at the O’Donaghue ‘hot spot’ are captured in the external magnetic field and deflected helically to the poles creating the constant auroral ovals. The ovals are constant because the fusion reaction is constant. The helium ions are stable and produce no recombination radiation, however their helical motion is observed from the Earth as partially polarized decimetric synchrotron radiation, currently not understood. Helium ions have a theoretical hyperfine transition between ground states at 3.46 cm which cannot be detected by any instrument on Juno. However, due to their great numbers surrounding Jupiter, they could easily be detected by radio telescopes on Earth supporting the mission but are currently not being sought.

Juno Data See: https://www.nasa.gov/press-release/a-whole-new-jupiter-first-science-results-from-nasa-s-juno-mission

Fig. 3.  Possible magnetic field anomalies associated with ancient impacts.

The solid MGH body of Jupiter cannot generate a magnetic field, but due to the uniformly distributed abundance of iron in the form of dust particles, ~318 times the mass of the iron in the Earth, it acts as a large, weak permanent magnet induced by the external magnetic field, therefore offset from the geometric axis. This has resulted in some of the unexpected features of the magnetic field near Jupiter’s surface. Interestingly, the early Juno MAG data suggests four large roughly circular anomalies in the surface magnetic field. These are the result of large craters from ancient, explosive planet-creating impacts, such as the recent one (6,000 BP) from which Venus’ mass was ejected. They are detectable by MAG due to the vast amounts of iron ejected. The same impact craters are probably sources of long wavelength gravity anomalies currently interpreted as mass flows in the interior (below).

The JEDI energetic particle detector has failed to identify the relativistic 3He+ ions with velocities as high as 20,000 km/sec surrounding Jupiter because it is too small to measure their unexpectedly short time-of-flight through the detector. However, the JEDI scientists have announced that unknown particles are penetrating the JEDI electron detector “leaving behind a fraction of their actual energy”. A second manifestation of the high energy helium ions are tiny explosive impacts on the Juno solar panels, the ejected material of which has been detected by the MAG star-tracker scopes. A third clue to the dominance of helium ions is the finding that the plasma frequency (auroral hiss) above the auroral ovals is lower than the expected value for electrons and protons, because helium ions are slightly more massive. These constitute circumstantial evidence of the currently unimagined dominance of high energy helium ions but do not identify them. Surprisingly, their presence could be easily proven from the Earth by a radio astronomical detection of the 3.46 cm ultrafine transition radiation between their ground states, which would be ‘a first’ for radio astronomers, since it has only been detected by lengthy integrations of signals from LDNs and planetary nebulae but never from a single identifiable source.

On every science pass, all six channels of the Juno MWR radiometer experiment are detecting heat from the same equatorial atmospheric  jet superrotating above the solid MGH surface of the planet. However, due to the current insistence on the ‘gas giant’ hypothesis, in which each channel was designed to sense radiation originating from different depths, the data is being interpreted as a layer of ammonia at the equator extending deep within the gas planet. But radiometers are passive receivers, not radars or spectrometers, thus the depths of the heat origin are strictly interpretations.

The Juno Radio Science (gravity) experiment is indicating a large “stable” homogeneous mass distribution within Jupiter out to approximately 0.9 RJ rather than the ten to twenty Earth-mass rocky-iron core required in the ‘gas giant’ hypothesis. The complexities in the medium wavelength gravity results, currently thought to be due to deep flows, are indicative of the very large basins or flooded palimpsests produced by ancient impact explosions suggested in the magnetic field data, the latest of which surrounds the fusion reaction, ~50,000 km east of the GRS at 22⁰ S. Lat. Future perijoves at the same longitudes will prove these are fixed features.

A crucial event for Juno will occur on July 10, 2017, when it is expected to pass over the Great Red Spot, since it will be exposed to the ‘tornado’ of 1030/sec relativistic 3He+ ions. Unaware of the danger, the Juno team may try to look down into the spot with the MWR, because in the ‘gas giant’ hypothesis it is thought to be a passive storm, but this would be disastrous. The radiation will penetrate the titanium instrumentation vault and cause the system to go into safe mode or worse yet damage Juno irreparably.

“The duty of the man who investigates the writings of scientists, if learning the truth is his goal, is to make himself an enemy of all that he reads, and … attack it from every side. He should also suspect himself as he performs his critical examination of it, so that he may avoid falling into either prejudice or leniency.”

 — Alhazen

Olympus Mons Origin

•April 1, 2017 • Comments Off on Olympus Mons Origin

Mars Olympus MonsThe largest features on the terrestrial planets did not just pop-up from the interior as currently taught. The Tibetan-Himalayan complex, 2600 square miles in extent, and the Tharsis Bulge on Mars, of which Olympus Mons is just a part, are not ancient features. The only way such anomalous features can rise is from close passes of other terrestrial planets. In the these two cases proto-Venus, born from a huge explosive impact on Jupiter only 6,000 years ago was the culprit. Its explosive birth injected it into the inner solar system, but not into a nice regular orbit. It rampaged throughout the inner solar system and its orbit only became tamed by multiple close encounters with Mars and the Earth.

In the Rg Veda, the original form of proto-Venus was called Aditi (diti meaning bounded, but the A prefix negates the meaning) therefore Unbounded. Due to its rampaging orbit, it was seen in many aspects, and  each was given a specific name. When seen in the day sky along with the Sun it was called Surya (sun maiden), when in the night sky it was Pushan (the travelers guide), and when it approached and burned the surface of the Earth from the Sahara to the Himalayas, it was called Agni (Fire). Proto-Venus was observed for 3,000 years while Mars went through its 30-year capture and release cycles, as MitraVaruna, Mitra was the glowing planet seen in daytime, while Varuna, with his beautiful out-gassing ‘robe’ which could only be seen at night. At the end of each Mars encounter, Venus was instrumental in the release of Mars from its geostationary orbit. All of these visual aspects of proto-Venus were called Adityas, sons of Aditi.  The list of Adityas also includes two more beautiful effects that appeared when proto-Venus approached the Earth as a morning or evening ‘star’. When its outgassing increased a portion of the glowing gases would flow toward the north magnetic pole and another toward the south resulting in the Ashvins (twins). When these gases struck the ionosphere they created Ushvas (aurora). becaused of its proximity, the auroras formed much nearer to the equator and could be seen by the Vedic peoplle. Concerning the Adityas, the Rg Veda even states “the wise know that the one has manifold names”.

The Rg Veda states that Indra and Agni had many battles early in the Vedic Period, because everyone could see atmosphere being drawn from Mars, the water in which froze into white ice crystals extending between the two worlds. This was pictured as Indra taking huge draughts of the intoxicating and nourishing Soma from Agni, which caused him to grow, that is to approach the Earth. When Indra approached the Earth it was greatly misshapen because the Tharsis Bulge, including Olympus Mons, leading to the description that Indra was an ugly child, in other words, not a spherical world. The image shows clearly that Olympus Mons was uplifted vertically by an external force. A world alone cannot form such a feature because there is nothing to ‘push against’

pmars earth Venus labelled

Fig.2 Orbits of Earth, Mars and proto-Venus between Mars’ geostationary encounters geostationary encounters showing capture and release points.

Indra then entered an orbit which crossed that of the Earth, shown in the second figure. It became captured from this orbit into a geostationary orbit of the Earth, only 33,000 km above Mt. Kailas around Nov 1, where it would remain for 14.4 years (a kalpa or manvantara) then be released at the vernal equinox, and remain the in the crossing orbit for 15.6 years. The resulting 30-year cycle was repeated one hundred times. During this 3,000 year period the the continents were raised and the entire Earth was covered with dozens of kilometers of soil, minerals, atmosphere, deluges (by Vayu, Maruts and flora in the form of intoxicating Soma which contained sprouts that covered the Earth) blasted from Mars by internal convulsions when the Moon or the Sun and Moon combined, passed behind the mandala or disk of Mars. The dangerous patas (falls of large hot meteorites) and Vajra (meteorites that shorted out the ionosphere to the Earth producing thunderbolts) caused by alignments with the sun and moon are described in Chapter XI of the Surya Siddhanta, titled in english translations as “Of Certain Malignant Aspects of the Sun and Moon”, the meaning of which is only revealed in my books and on this site.

A ‘bow’ feature on Io due to a volcano

When the alignments occurred, Indra took on a frightful aspect, described in the Surya Siddhanta as “Being black, of frightful shape, bloody-eyed, big-bellied, the source of misfortune to all, it is produced again and again”.  This was the face of Rudra, famed for his bow, which were actually arcs of material ejected from an active volcano seen near the limb of Mars from which the meteorites (Maruts) were launched.

The world we know today was recreated in the last 6,000 years after the dinosaurs were buried under dozens of kilometers of ocean-bottom material, then by iridium out-gassed from proto-Venus and the entire life-related material from Mars..

Isaiah 65:17 For, behold, I create new heavens and a new earth: and the former shall not be remembered, nor come into mind.

Tethys Sea? (Updated)

•January 1, 2017 • Comments Off on Tethys Sea? (Updated)

Geologists Concept of Tethys Sea

Cyclic Catastrophism

Fig.2 Orbits of Earth, Mars and proto-Venus between Mars' geostationary encounters geostationary encounters showing capture and release points.

Fig.1  Orbits of Earth, Mars and proto-Venus between Mars’ geostationary encounters geostationary encounters showing capture and release points.

As explained in many posts on this site, cosmic encounters of Venus, Mars and Mercury with the Earth in the last 6,000 years produced all the evidence currently interpreted as the Cenezoic Era covering the last 66 million years. The the surface of the Earth – soil, rocks, ocean, atmosphere, flora and fauna has come from Mars during the last 6,000 years and cannot be used to determine dates of Earth events.

The Younger Dryas stadial was delineated by two overturnings of the entire lithosphere of the Earth without changing its rotation rate, due to two close passes (encounters) with a large body. These resulted in the capture of the Moon as indicated by the climate of the Earth changing at that date to the Holocene. The overturnings caused the oceans to overflow the continents, covering vast areas with two layers of ocean bottom material.

About 6,000 years BP (Before the Present) proto-Venus was blasted out of Jupiter by a fusion explosion resulting from an impact on its solid, highly deuterated surface. Venus subsequently overturned the lithosphere on two close passes, finishing the destruction of the dinosaurs, scorching a path from the Sahara across Asia to the Himalayas and outgassing its geological ‘signature’, known as the iridium spike, found in all parts of the Earth. The total of four inversions increased the thickness of the asthenosphere, the slippery layer on which the lithosphere and surface on which we live freely moved, and reduced its viscosity in preparation for subsequent cosmic encounters.

Proto-Venus then sheparded the most ancient terrestrial planet, Mars, which was a living planet, from its original orbit, similar to that of Venus today, into an orbit which intersected that of the Earth. This reduced proto-Venus’ orbit inside that of the Earth (Fig. 1).  From this orbit Mars became captured in a geostationary orbit of the Earth above Mt. Kailash, at the Nov. 1 crossing point and remained in that orbit for 14.4 years, then was released on the vernal equinox, the other crossing point, back into the orbit shown in Fig. 1,  where it remained for 15.6 years. Thus one cycle of capture and release took 30 years. The cycle was repeated one hundred times between 3687 and 687 BC. Every geological feature currently attributed to the Cenezoic era (66 million years) on Earth was formed during this 3,000 year period, by cosmic forces. Only at the end of this period did Mars, Venus and Mercury leave the vicinity of the Earth and enter their current orbits. The prophet Isaiah who lived in 687 BC states the words of the Lord including a caveat exquisitely predicting the world’s current understanding of the ancient events:

Isaiah 65:17 17 For, behold, I create new heavens and a new earth: and the former shall not be remembered, nor come into mind.

Fig. 3 Correction curve for 14C datng is evidence for a complete change of the Earth's atmosphere during the Vedic Period

Fig. 2  14C tree-ring correction is evidence for a change of the Earth’s atmosphere, invalidating Ar-Ar dating during the Vedic Period.

The life on Mars was blasted to the Earth by the eruption of more than one hundred volcanoes in its northern hemisphere, which remained facing the Earth during each 14.4-year (a manvantara in the Rg Veda) geostationary encounter, also called a kalpa.  The blasts occurred when the Moon, or the Sun and Moon combined, passed behind Mars’ disk, which was 530 times the area of the full Moon (REF 1). As a result of the one hundred kalpas, all of the atmosphere, water, soil, flora (as manna, soma) and fauna (long story) were gradually transferred to the Earth, as mankind looked on. The top layer of Earth, deposited since the dinosaurs were exterminated, 6000 years BP, were blasted from Mars and the dates obtained from the ubiquitous zircons and Argon in the atmosphere are therefore not indicative of Earth ages.

Each time Mars became captured in geostationary orbit above Mt. Kailias (normally  at 31 deg. N latitude), the gravitational ‘handle’ of the entire

Fig. 5. H G Wells map showing samudra

Fig. 3. H G Wells map showing the samudra, the confluence formed by the tidal effect of Mars

lithosphere,  was drawn south to the ecliptic plane, the plane of the solar system, where it remained for each (14.4-year) kalpa. During these periods there were no seasonal variations on the Earth. The temporary north pole was in central Canada, evidenced by the huge Laurentine glacier that formed there, the recent age of which is revealed by the rapid isostatic rebound at that location. Mars, known as Indra in the Rg Veda, was renown for “releasing the waters”, i.e melting and breaking up the Himalayan glaciers,  characterized as battles with Vritra, serpent-like foes that ‘confined’ the water in the mountain valleys, by raining down of innumerable huge flaming meteorites, some of which shorted out the ionosphere causing “thunderbolts” which broke up the glaciers.

 

Figure 2. Five Himalayan river originate from Mt. Kailas

Fig. 4. Five largest Himalayan rivers originate from Mt. Kailas.

At each capture, the tidal effect of Mars drew the waters of the hemisphere toward the Himalayas, particularly from distant places such as the eastern edge of the Atlantic Ocean, the Mediterranean and the Indian and Pacific Oceans, where the tidal force was more horizontal.

A huge stationary tidal sea accumulated covering northern India, peaking close to Mt. Kailias at Lake Manasowar, elevation of 5,000 meters. This ‘eastern sea’ was an every-day part of Aryan life, called the samudra, a “confluence of waters”, appearing 150 times in the Rg Veda but with no understanding that these waters came from the entire eastern hemisphere. This tidal confluence is shown in Figure 3, covering northern India well into the Himalayas, which was miraculously published in a book titled “A Short History of The World” by H.G. Wells, who had no idea of its significance. The map also shows the Mediterranean Sea partially emptied. I have annotated the location of the Aryan civilization in the Punjab, which, as a result of the confluence was a seafaring nation but only during each kalpa. The sediments deposited high in the Himalayas by the one hundred samudras are imagined to be the evidence of a very ancient Tethys sea that existed before the continents drifted into their current positions, when in truth the deposits were made between 3687 and 687 BC. At the end of each kalpa, this sea rushed down through the Himalayas catastrophically carving the five largest rivers which all have their origin at Mt. Kailas (Fig. 4).

These 30-year periodic flows followed 14.4 years later by the lesser return flows, called ‘raash’ in the Hebrew Bible, were the reason that the Levantine cultures were centered on tells and built pyramids (REF). At the beginning of each kalpa, the eastern Atlantic (doggerland) flowed across the Mediterranean, which was practically emptied, resulting in one hundred layers of evaporates, currently called the M-layer and discussed by paleontologists as the Messinian Salinity Crisis. At the end of each kalpa, the waters mixed in the samudra returned to their normal levels, but not to their origins, by all posssible paths, at the same time mixing with new living material fallen from Mars resulting in the confused state of geopaleontology concerning Tethys, Eastern, Central and Western Paratethys, etc.

The continents Laurasia and Gondwana never existed, because the Cenezoic never existed, all the events currently attributed to it occurred between 3687 and 687 BC. Because of the profound changes in the Earth during this period any investigation of more archaic events is questionable.

The paths of this east-west flow were modifed during the 3,000-year Vedic Period by plutons raising the central Eurasian mountain ranges due to the relative motion of the lithosphere to the mantle, not by the collision of the African and Arabian plates with Eurasia. The mass of Mars (still had its solid core, Mercury) tidally linked to the lithosphere via Kailas, slowed the lithosphere’s rotation relative to the mantle by an amount testified by the fact that all ancient cultures had two calendars, with 360 days per year during each kalpa and 365.25 days per year between kalpas. This allows the calculation of the relative motion of the lithosphere relative to the mantle. The resulting westward motion of the lithosphere, 15 miles per hour, at a 30 deg angle dictated by the motion of Mt. Kailas in the ecliptic plane, profoundly effected the continents of the Earth (REF) resulting in the subduction of the oceanic plates on the western edges of the continents and the resultant mountain building, e.g. the rocky Mountains. Due to the prior reduction of the viscosity and thickening of the asthenosphere by the four overturnings, the relative motion of the lithosphere and mantle continuously provided enormous amounts of fresh magma which intruded up into the low-lying areas of the continents, raising the Alps, Carpathians, Taurus,  Elburz and Dinarides and the North American craton. The 15.6-year intervals between kalpas provided for the slower cooling of the plutonic rocks to form the magnificent, lower density granite (REF), found nowhere else in the solar system, giving the continents additional buoyancy needed, since the sea levels on Earth rose some 150 meters as the deluges from Mars were added.

Proverbs 8:29   “… he set a boundary for the sea so the waters would not exceed his limits, when he marked out the foundations of the earth.”

Job 38:

4 Where wast thou when I laid the foundations of the earth? declare, if thou hast understanding.

5 Who hath laid the measures thereof, if thou knowest? or who hath stretched the line upon it?

6 Whereupon are the foundations thereof fastened? or who laid the corner stone thereof?

8 Or who shut up the sea with doors, when it brake forth, as if it had issued out of the womb?

10 And brake up for it my decreed place, and set bars and doors,

11 And said, Hitherto shalt thou come, but no further: and here shall thy proud waves be stayed?

These 15.6-year intervals also allowed the water on Mars to be redistributed around the entire planet, since only the water in its northern hemisphere was available for blasting to the Earth during each encounter.

A vertical mile of horizontally bedded Deccan Traps (Credit Mike Widdowson)

Fig. 5.  A vertical mile of horizontally bedded Deccan Traps  (Credit Mike Widdowson)

The Deccan Traps were extruded as a result of the tidal force of Mars directly above when in its geostationary orbit. Geologists pay little attention to the fact that there are many (one hundred?) equally thick layers some 20 meters thick. Each layer of the Traps corresponds to a single kalpa (Fig. 5). (See Deccan Traps are a time machine). This was the same sub-surface rock from the asthenosphere that produced the granite plutons beneath the continents but it rose in the Indian ocean and therefore cooled rapidly, forming small crystals, producing basalt. The shifting of Mt. Kailas to the ecliptic plane during each kalpa resulted in the displacement of southern India in the south of the geomagnetic field, resulting in the reversed magnetic field of the Traps. Failure to understand cyclic catastrophism has led to the notion that the Deccan Traps were formed when India was located at reunion island, at 30 degrees S and that since their formation the Indian continent has drifted northward some 2,000 miles over the last 66 million years. Deposits with reversed or altered magnetic fields, designated ‘chrons’ have been used to analyze the Tethys and Paratethys resulting in the great ages thought to be due to continental drift.

This problem has been exposed in attempts to date the Deccan Trap rocks using U-Pb and K-Ar methods.  These have failed to produce ancient ages because the traps are not old. As a result, material between the steps, called separates, which settled from Mars between kalpas, provided a wide range of ages, since they were blasted from hundreds of Martian volcanoes, which have been used to construct the Cenezoic misinterpretation.

The cyclic encounters also produced the rythmic sedimentary deposits in western North America as the Laurentine glacier melted at the end of each kalpa, forming Lake Missoula, the Walla Walla rythmites, the Colorado River, the Grand Canyon and the recently studied layered deposits of the Bouse Formation currently attributed to the “Ice Ages”.

Amazingly, these cosmic events took place in the same period as the Old Testament Bible, which is a indeed an historical record of God’s (re)creation of the Earth. Listen to the Word of God, O ye of little faith.