Confusing Climate Disasters with Planetary Encounters

•January 1, 2019 • Comments Off on Confusing Climate Disasters with Planetary Encounters

Figure 1. Dendro correction for 14C dating vs date

Climate scientists are predicting dire consequences based on data from what is imagined to be early in the fictitious Cenezoic era. Quoting from Wikipedia:

“The data indicates that a The Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum (PETM), was a time period with more than 8 °C warmer global average temperature than today. This climate event began at the time boundary of the Paleogene between the Paleocene and Eocene geological epochs.[1] The exact age and duration of the event is uncertain, perhaps 55.5 million years ago. An associated period of massive carbon injection into the atmosphere has been estimated to have lasted no longer than 20,000 years. The entire warm period lasted for about 200,000 years. Global temperatures increased by 5–8 °C.[3] The carbon dioxide was likely released in two pulses, the first lasting less than 2,000 years. Such a repeated carbon release is in line with current global warming. A main difference is that during the Paleocene–Eocene Thermal Maximum, the planet was essentially ice-free.[4] However, the amount of released carbon, according to a recent study, suggests a modest 0.2 gigatonnes per year (at peaks 0.58 gigatonnes); humans today add about 10 gigatonnes per year.”

Fig. 2 Path scorched by proto-Venus from Sahara to Himalayas

Cyclic Catastrophism

Based on ancient texts (RgVeda, Egyptian, Greek and Biblical) cyclic catastrophism posits that the events currently ascribed to the Cenezoic era, actually took place in the last 6,000 years. The incorrect dating is due to the entire sedimentary crust of the Earth having been blasted from hundreds of volcanoes on Mars between 3687 and 687 BC along with oceans. Therefore the ubiquitous zircons across the world give wide ranges of U-Pb dates from Mars, which is 700 million years older than Earth.  The initial event of this Vedic Period is well documented in ancient texts: as Phaethon scorching the Earth in Greek myth; as Agni , the blazing form of Aditi in the RgVeda and the immediate aftermath in Genesis 1:2 “And the earth was without form, and void; and darkness was upon the face of the deep”.The resulting desiccation path of proto-Venus across Africa and on to the HImalayas is the single most prominent feature on the face of the Earth today (Figure 2). The continuity of the scorched zone across the continents proves there has been no relative motion of Africa and Eurasia since.

The two close passes of the newly created, molten, out-gassing proto-Venus left behind the iridium spike signaling the K-T extinction, inverted the spin axis of the lithosphere twice within a few centuries, causing the oceans of the world to flow across the continents depositing two tens-of-km thick layers of ocean-bottom material seen today as Mid-Lithosphere Discontinuities (MLD). These released the two pulses of benthic CO2 from deep in the ocean bemoaned above and in many climate disaster posts as a predicted consequence of the present “global warming”. They also explain why there was no arctic ice during the PETM.

After these encounters, Proto-Venus gravitationally displaced the living planet Mars, full of vegetation, oceans, atmosphere, from its interior orbit, similar to that of Venus today, into an orbit that intersected that of the Earth.

Fig. 3 Orbits of Earth, Mars and proto-Venus between Mars’ geostationary encounters geostationary encounters showing capture and release points.

From this orbit Mars was captured in a geostationary orbit of the Earth for 14.4 years  and released  to the orbit shown for 15.6 years ninety-nine times during which all of its crust, atmosphere, soil, oceans were blasted to the Earth, completely covering the continents. These encounters also changed the atmosphere as shown in Figure 1, and the cycles created the granitic mountains and separated the continents to their current positions.

All mammalian life, flowering plants, fruit trees, were introduced early in the Vedic period, 3687, along with Homo Sapiens Sapiens who witnessed and composed the chants that became myths. None of these ‘evolved’ from lower forms. There was no time for evolution.

Isaiah 45:12  I have made the earth, and created man upon it: I, even my hands, have stretched out the heavens, and all their host have I commanded.

Origin of Giant Planets

•December 24, 2018 • Comments Off on Origin of Giant Planets


Fig. 1 Atacama images reveal many giant planets forming in orbits of proto-stars.

The solar system comprises two fundamentally different types of planets: giants and terrestrials. At present the origin of these two types of planets are not understood. The recent Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) images of more than twenty very young star systems provide the information to determine the origin and composition of giant planets. At the temperatures of these systems (< 50 K) planets can only form from ices.

Methane gas hydrate (MGH) forms naturally at the extremely low temperatures (< 50 K) in the outer reaches of Large Dark Nebulae. In MGH, a clathrate, a dozen or more water molecules form rigid cage-like, Type I, structures. Each cage physically encapsulates a methane molecule but can envelope many other foreign molecules or atoms. Type II cages contain larger atoms or molecules, including Ar, Kr and Xe. The two types are intermixed, maximizing the mass of foreign particles physically, but not chemically, incorporated. The nominal composition of pure MGH is (CH4)8(H2O)46, with an average density of 0.9 g/cm3. Tests have shown that MGH is two orders of magnitude stronger than water ice at 208 K and the difference increases with decreasing temperature.i This strength is further enhanced in highly deuterated MGH.

Giant Planet Formation
Millimeter studies of Large Dark Nebulae (LDN 1689N, 134, 154, 1544)ii report a 1010 enhancement of deuterium fractionation in the form of ND3 and D3 molecules in their colder outer reaches (20 K). Surfaces of dust particles in dark nebulae act as catalysts for the formation of simple molecules, which then combine forming ices, primarily H2O, HDO, D2O, encapsulating the heavy elements in the form of dust or nanoparticles.iii Accretion continues at the next stage by the formation of deuterated MGH. High deuterium fractionation increases its stability. By this symbiotic process, clathrate giant planets accrete the complete heavy element abundances in nascent stellar systems increasing their average densities to ~ 1.33.

Young star systems revealed in the ALMA images are the natural progression of LDNs as they contract and their inherent angular momentum is realized. As observed in the LDNs, high concentrations of deuterium are present in the cold outer reaches of each system where giant planets form before nuclear fusion of deuterium and protons begins in the proto-star. Increasing internal pressure during accretion compensates for later increases in temperature (Fig. 1). Cold hydration makes possible the incorporation of the noble gases, argon, krypton, and xenon as have been detected in Jupiter by the Galileo atmospheric probe.

As observed in the ALMA images, the giant planets alone comprise the nascent star system. The MGH composition of giants suggests that they are ~ 85% water. Therefore, the giant planets in the solar system comprise 275 earth-masses of water, explaining that all the icy satellites and rings orbiting the giant planets are due to impacts which ejected material, primarily water into the surrounding space.
The author maintains that Juno data is revealing Jupiter is a solid, frozen methane gas hydrate (MGH) planet which incorporates the known solar system element abundances. Its excess luminosity, multiple wind bands and powerful magnetic field are driven by the fusion of deuterium and protons at impact sites on its surface, for example, the larger Shoemaker-Levy 9 fragments. Impacts of asteroids on their MGH surfaces release methane found in the atmospheres of all giant planets.

Terrestrial Planet Formation
The low density, solid composition, full abundance of elements, high deuterium and water content of the giant planets are ideal sources for producing terrestrial planets. Impacts on these giants instantaneously compress and heat the deuterated surface producing powerful fusion explosions which exponentially increase the energy of the impacts. The heavy elements blasted into the inner solar system by impacts quickly collapse releasing gravitational radiation combined with recombination radiation forming a near-spherical molten core/mantle of the future terrestrial proto-planet, which has no inherent spin. This powerful radiation pressure disburses the more plentiful, lighter elements into the inner solar system. They gradually become captured by the extant terrestrial planets and the new planet when it cools. The natural abundances of the elements in the clathrate giant planets form the lithosphere, crust, atmosphere and oceans of the terrestrial planet.

Evidence of such a recent impact on Jupiter is present in its excess luminosity and multiple zonal wind bands, due to a slowly declining fusion reaction p +D -> 3He++ + 4.98 MeV on its surface, the primary product of which, fast (17,800 km/sec) helions, delineate the Great Red Spot due to the powerful Coriolis effect on the rapidly rotating planet. The heavy elements released from the MGH by the localized heat of the surface fusion have not been identified because they react to form high temperature compounds, such as CS, proximal to the fusion, but cool as they rise through the GRS vortex continuously forming solid particulate aerosols, the source of Jupiter’s colorful clouds, but fall to the surface below the cloud-tops as rapidly as they are released.v

i. W.B.Durham, S.H.Kirby, L.A.Stern, and W.Zhang. The strength and rheology of methane clathrate hydrate. Journal of Geophysical Research, 2003,108, 2182.
ii .E.Roueff. Interstellar deuterated ammonia: from NH3 to ND3, (2005), DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20052724
iii L.Zhang. Platinum-based nanocages with subnanometer-thick walls and well-defined, controllable facets, Science, 24 July 2015, vol. 349, p. 379, 412.
iv N.J.Habing. Disappearance of stellar debris disks around main-sequence stars after 400 million years, Nature 401, 456-458 (30 September 1999).

Origin of Giant Planets

•December 20, 2018 • Comments Off on Origin of Giant Planets

Fig. 1 Atacama images reveal giant planets forming cold in orbits of numerous proto-stars.

New results from Atacama show that giant planets form cold in their planetary nebulae before fusion begins in their star. I have explained this years ago. Quoting from my paper  “Evidence for a Solid Jupiter” – February 2018. (See below) As explained in the same paper and in many posts at the terrestrial planets are formed by later impacts on the giant planets. As explained in another paper, Venus – A young Earth, The most recent, proto-Venus was formed by an impact on Jupiter 6,000-years BP. These papers are always rejected by the academic ‘experts’ and cannot even by placed on ArXive.

1. Introduction
Juno data is revealing that Jupiter is a solid, frozen, highly deuterated Methane Gas Hydrate (MGH) planet which incorporates the known solar system element abundances. The only hydrogen and helium present in its atmosphere today is that which has been released from the MGH surface in the last 6,000 years. MGH began forming at extremely low temperatures (< 50 K) in the outer reaches of a Large Dark Nebula in the presence of ample methane. The pressure of the accreting planet served to increase its stability. Laboratory analyses of terrestrial MGH reveals that a dozen or more water molecules form rigid cage-like Type I structures. Each cage typically encapsulates a methane molecule but can contain other foreign molecules or atoms. Type II cages
are larger and can contain larger atoms or molecules, including Ar, Kr and Xe at very low
temperatures. The two types are usually intermixed. The nominal laboratory composition of MGH is (CH4)8(H2O)46, with an average density of 0.9 g/cm^3,
usually with 13C slightly enhanced. Tests have shown that MGH is two orders of magnitude stronger than water ice at 208 K, and the difference increases with decreasing temperature.1 This strength is further enhanced in highly deuterated MGH.

2. Giant Planet Formation
Infrared studies of proto-stars and Large Dark Nebulae (LDN 1689N) report a 1010 enhancement of deuterium fractionation in the form of ND3 and D3 molecules in their cold outer reaches (20 K). Recent events suggest that the giant planets in the solar system formed in such a dusty, highly deuterated Large Dark Nebula when ices of volatile molecules (H2O, NH3, CO2 and CH4) formed on small dust grains or nanoparticles.
3 Accretion continued at the next stage by the formation of methane Gas Hydrate (MGH av. density = 0.9) enhanced by high deuterium fractionation. By this symbiotic process, Jupiter accreted all the heavy elements in their known abundances in the nascent solar system resulting in its average density of 1.33.

Juno – Evidence of a Solid Jupiter 2 / 22 J Ackerman
Due to their large orbital radii and periods, the giant planets formed slowly, therefore cold, over long-time spans, typically millions of years.1 They began to form in the cold outer reaches of the LDN before the proto-star at the center of rotation began fusing its deuterium and protons. Increasing internal pressure during accretion compensated for slight increases in temperature. Cold hydration made possible the incorporation of the noble gases argon, krypton,
and xenon which have been detected by the Galileo atmospheric probe.

The most abundant volatile molecules not accreted in Jupiter formed Saturn, Uranus and Neptune, which also comprise Methane Gas Hydrates. Primordial hydrogen and helium not captured in gas hydrates escaped from the solar system in a
few million years as observed in very young systems. The giant planets alone made up the original solar system. The MGH hypothesis suggests that Jupiter and Saturn together comprise >275 Earth masses of water. Therefore, all the icy satellites and rings around the giant planets are due to impacts which ejected material, primarily water into the surrounding space.”

The previous post explains that the rings of Saturn were formed by impacts of bodies blasted from Jupiter, which in turn caused caused fusion explosions on Saturn.

To raise new questions, new possibilities, to regard old problems from a new angle, requires creative imagination and marks real advance in science. A. Einstein

NASA – Saturn Loosing Rings?

•December 18, 2018 • Comments Off on NASA – Saturn Loosing Rings?

Fig. 1. Enhanced colors of Saturn’s rings, showing the variety of elements in Methane Gas Hydrate clathrate


Science Daily reports a new paper being published in Icarus ($$$) by James O’Donoghue et al. estimating that Saturn’s rings will be gone in a mere 100 million years. Academics are inured with these vast time spans, while ancient texts from all cultures reveal that every planet in the solar system was changed, beginning in the Younger Dryas, with the capture of the Moon, and ending in 687 BC, when the terrestrial planets entered their current orbits. The impact of

Fig. 2 Jupiter plume (Juno) extending from 22 degrees South Latitude

the planet (Metis in Greek mythology) on Jupiter, was what really got things moving, because in addition to the creation of proto-Venus, this impact left behind a long-term fusion furnace at the impact site (22 ° S Lat) which continues to this day producing the Great Red Spot and driving the excess luminosity, zonal wind bands, powerful magnetic field and continually release the particulate aerosols which produce Jupiter colored clouds and settle to its surface.

That fusion blaze originally produced the Galilean moons and added material to them for over five thousand years. But most of the material expanded and cooled forming small condensations moving at similar velocities splatted and stuck together forming millions of 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko asteroids, flinging them in all directions due to Jupiter’s fast rotation, slowing it to its current 9.9 hour rate. These currently comprise the main asteroid belt, the Kreutz sungrazers, which produce sunspots and the millions of bodies orbiting Jupiter’s L4 and L5 nodes.

Saturn’s Rings

Fig. 3.  Saturn ‘storm’ imaged by Cassini

Fig. 4. NASA Cassini probe imaged ‘spokes’ showing material  being blasted from Saturn into the rings.

Unfortunately, Saturn was just the poor (solid highly deuterated methane gas hydrate) guy next-door to the big bully Jupiter and was continually bombarded with these 67Ps, each of which caused fusion explosions on Saturn’s surface, just as Shoemaker-Levy -9 did on Jupiter. The gases ejected by these impacts for the last 6,000 years have expanded the atmosphere giving Saturn’s apparently low density, whereas it is really the same composition as Jupiter. The larger, more frequent impacts formed the rings of Saturn, beginning 6,000 years BP, but continue to contribute mass to this day, because many 67P s are still invisibly zooming in orbits of the Sun. The impacts on Saturn are occasionally seen by Earth telescopes when their ‘mushroom’ clouds appear at the cloud tops and the ejected material has recently been observed as shadows or impacts on the rings. The falling ring material will become part of the atmosphere.

Solar System

The Earth was completely re-formed and mankind created amid recent solar system chaos.  The state of everything in the solar system we observe today is a result of cyclic catastrophism.  No feature on any planet is older than 6,000 years, indeed Mercury, (Sarama, Hathor, Hermes) was first revealed and Venus born about 3687 BC. Uranus and Neptune have been bombarded during this period by Jupiter, resulting in their current atmospheres. The astronomical ages imagined and enforced by academia are needed to allow for evolution, which never occurred on Earth.

“Strange is our situation here upon this earth. Each of us comes for a short visit, not knowing why, yet sometimes seeming to a divine purpose.” – Albert Einstein


One Simple Myth

•December 18, 2018 • Comments Off on One Simple Myth

In Greek myth Zeus turned his wife Metis into a fly and swallowed her. This gave him such a terrible headache that he had Hephaestus, the handyman or blacksmith deity, split open his head and the incandescent PallasAthene (proto-Venus) was born in “full battle dress”. Roman myth adopted the Greek version, naming proto-Venus Minerva. Egyptian myth initially named proto-Venus Osiris. In the RgVeda, Aditi was born from Dauspitar, the heaven father, the brightest planet high in the heaven, by his maya or secret power. All myths of this impact have in common the statement that ‘the Earth cried out.’ Both the Metis and the maya version of this myth are consistent with the impact of a cold planet sized body impacting Jupiter, since a body the size of a terrestrial planet would not have been visible from the Earth.

Aditi (Aditi meaning Un–bounded), rampaged throughout the inner solar system having many battles with Indra (Mars). In the RgVeda proto-Venus was given different names depending on the circumstances of the moment: in daylight along side the Sun, Surya (Sun maiden); in the night sky, Pusan, guardian of the traveler; when approaching Earth and scorching a wide path from the Sahara to the Himalayas, Agni (fire); and after a thin crust formed, Mitra/Varuna. The combined aspects of the rampaging proto-Venus were described as the Adityas, ”sons’ of Aditi”, but the RgVeda adds a caveat “the wise man knows what is one is called by manifold names”. In Mesopotamia, proto-Venus was Inana/Ištar (Sumarian/Akkadian).

Physical Evidence
Approximately six thousand years (~4000 BC) after the first two inversions of the Earth’s lithosphere, an enormous impact on Jupiter, probably the planet-sized body from which Earth had captured the Moon during the Younger Dryas, produced an incandescent plasma cloud at least a thousand times the size of the giant planet itself which rebounded into the inner solar system, contracted, becoming the star-like proto-Venus. That impact explosion was observed by all ancient cultures and is part of their mythologies, but the dark impacting body could not have been seen. The reason that the impact was observed by all cultures is stated in all of the above myths, which claim that “the Earth cried out”, alerting all people to search the sky. Although no sound could have propagated across more than 500 million km to the Earth, gravitational impulses also travel at the speed of light through empty space, thereby revealing the great power of the impact event. In this case it was due to the mass of proto-Venus being instantly blasted from Jupiter into the inner solar system.

The CMB?
A small amount of heat from this impact explosion, currently being re-radiated back to the Earth isotropically from galactic dust particles, is a confirmation that this event occurred in the solar system. In addition, several alignments of the radiation field with the solar system, facetiously named ‘the axis of evil’ and a 2% decrease in its power in the ten years between the WMAP and Planck measurements have nullified the big bang hypothesis. Despite the obvious problems, cosmologists now claim that this “big bang” has replaced God.
Proto-Venus’ birth, 6,000 BP, described consistently in all major myths, confutes six major tenets of academic science, that: (a) Jupiter and the other giant planets are highly deuterated, solid, methane gas hydrate (MGH); (b) each terrestrial planet was formed by similar impacts on Jupiter at quite different dates based on the ages of native rocks, Mars 4.6 Ba (billion years) and Earth 3.9 Ba; (c) because MGH is a clathrate, Jupiter physically encapsulates the full range of known element abundances in the solar system, indeed, these abundances originated from Jupiter; (d) proto-Venus is a hot, molten body comprising only the heavy elements which will become its core and mantle; (e) the more abundant lighter elements ejected by the impact explosion have not been able to settle on its surface due to its high temperature, 864 F.; (f) The giant planets alone formed the solar system, the age of which cannot be determined.

Most scientific disciplines allow the verification of experiments and their conclusions. Unfortunately, this is not possible in planetary science where conclusions precede the data. Other views are not presented, even by members of science departments. A couple of interesting Einstein quotes:

“I stand before quantum mechanics with admiration and suspicion,” and to Born (December 4, 1926) Einstein had said, “Quantum mechanics demands serious
attention. But an inner voice tells me that this is not the true Jacob.. The theory accomplishes a lot, but it does not bring us closer to the secrets of the Old One. In any case, I am convinced that He does not play dice.””

Einstein On Epistomology of Science (annotated)

Concepts that have proven useful in ordering things easily achieve such an authority over us that we forget their earthly origins and accept them as unalterable givens. Thus they come to be stamped as “necessities of thought,” “a priori givens,” etc. The path of scientific advance is often made impassable for a long time through such errors. For that reason, it is by no means an idle game if we become practiced in analyzing the long commonplace concepts [gas giants, solar system 4.6 years old] and exhibiting those circumstances upon which their justification and usefulness depend, how they have grown up, individually, out of the givens of experience. By this means, their all-too-great authority will be broken. They will be removed if they cannot be properly legitimated, corrected if their correlation with given things be far too superfluous, replaced by others if a new system can be established that we prefer for whatever reason. (Einstein 1916, 102)


The New Solar System

•December 7, 2018 • Comments Off on The New Solar System

Captures of Mars

Fig. 1 Orbits of Earth, Mars and proto-Venus between Mars’ geostationary encounters  showing capture and release points.

6,000 years ago Mars was in a Venus-like orbit with plenty of sunlight, oceans and was full of life. Proto-Venus was created by an explosive impact on Jupiter and raged into the inner solar system with excess kinetic energy. It exchanged orbital energy with Mars, bringing Mars into an orbit that intersected that of the Earth (Figure 1). Mars approached Earth (Nov.1) on the night side when Mt. Kailas (31° N Lat.), the gravitational focus of the Himalayas, was 36 ° above the ecliptic. The Himalayas, which acted as a handle of the entire lithosphere, became tidally linked to Mars, forcing the lithosphere of the Earth to rotate more slowly with Mt. Kailas remaining in the ecliptic plane and Mars directly above in a geostationary orbit for each 14.4-year encounter.  This is how captures occurred with angular momentum and kinetic energy conserved. They were restored to Mars at each release of 15.6 years, allowing a total of ninety-nine cycles of 30- years.

Fig. 2. Lithosphere motion relative to mantle. (Differential Rotation … Ricardi et al JGR May 1991)

Evidence of this geologically recent rotation of the lithosphere is shown in Figure 2. The tidal drag of Mars slowed the rotation of the lithosphere. The reason all ancient cultures had two calendars, of 360 and 365.25 days per year. During each encounter the slower motion of the lithosphere relative to the mantle (24 km/hr) continuously supplied silicate lava (rhyolite) up into the continents where they were shallow. The crystallization of this material, during the 15.6-year intervals between encounters, formed layers of granite, comprising the plutons, which although homogeneous are now known to be layered. Ninety-nine encounters in 3,000 years produced all of the granite which raised the continents between 3687 and 687 BC. The tidal drag of Mars also created the subduction zones on the western continental coasts and their associated mountains ranges, e.g. Rockies and Andes and drew North and South America westward opening up the continental divide in the mid Atlantic and creating the Pacific “ring of fire”. The remaining signs of subduction and lithosphere motion are merely the aftermath of these geologically recent events. (Figure 3)

Fig. 3. Subduction zones along west coast of N & S American Continents

Mars During Geostationary orbits

The lithosphere of Mars also revolved independently of its mantle during each geostationary capture period. The mass anomaly, Tharsis Bulge, on its equator was forced to remain equidistant from the Earth (conservation of angular momentum) resulting in the north pole of Mars’ lithosphere remaining oriented toward the Earth. All the water in Mars’ northern hemisphere was drawn toward the north pole (outflow channels) at each capture by tidal effect of the Earth. The same tidal effect more slowly melted and

Fig 4 Mars northern island covered with last maelstrom, surrounded by sedimentary deposits from the northern ocean.

drew up lava (the world egg) within the ocean which grew to form an island, still present at Mars north pole (Figure 4), identified in Genesis as the raqia . The continuous tidal effect then formed a unique hardened vertical lava tube column, resembling a Banyan tree 2,000 km high which became the most propitiated deity in every culture in the world, called Agni, Osiris, Atlas, Brahma, Zeus, Yggdrasil and “the column of smoke and fire” in the Bible. Convulsions often shattered the column spreading scoria over the

Fig. 5 Viking 2 site, 48 N Lat. surrounded by scoria from collapsed lava column at north pole.

northern third of Mars (Figure 5). As on Earth, the motion of the lithosphere relative to the interior provided unlimited lava for hundreds of volcanoes in Mars northern hemisphere which blasted rocks, soil, saline water, atmosphere, and vegetation to the Earth when alignments with the Moon or with the Moon and Sun combined, caused convulsions within Mars. This explains the fact that the northern third of Mars is now 7 km below the datum. Moon alignments occurred potentially every fifteen days when the inclined orbit of the Moon crossed the ecliptic. This rock, soil ( & zircons), water, atmosphere and vegetation (as manna, Soma, haoma) now covers the entire Earth.

Releases of Mars

Venus, in its eccentric interior orbit (Figure 1) reached aphelion and inferior conjunction every 30 years on the vernal equinox of the fourteenth year of each capture period. The alignment of Venus with Moon and Sun, caused enormous convulsions shattering the hardened lava column and exposing the large volcanic vent in the northern island which fed the great column. The indirect tidal forces of the three combined to raise the northern ocean above the island, which then cascaded into the deep vent as a whirlpool or maelstrom (Figure 5) and flashed to steam. The pressure opened the 4,000-km long fault, called the Valles Marineris, forcing the solid iron core out, first as the “eye of Ra”, but it continued out as an independent body Hathor, one third the mass of the ancient Mars. The core’s ejection, to the east, reduced the orbital velocity of the outer shell of Mars which started to drift to the west leaving its geostationary orbit. The solid core, also called Sarama (RgVeda), Hermes (Greek), Mercury (Roman) and The Sun Star in Hebrew Tanakh, zoomed low around the Earth to the East in a slingshot maneuver, “killing men in the desert”, caught up to the shell in eight days and reentered the gap before Mars attained its holding orbit (Figure 1). Each complete cycle, capture and release, occurred ninety-nine times. These spectacular releases were observed by everyone on Earth and are celebrated by every culture in the world as eight day or nine night festivals beginning on the vernal equinox.

Fig. 6 Venus and Mercury cavorting in a 5th century BC

Solid Core Became Mercury

At the end of the last encounter, 687 BC, the solid core was deflected by Venus so did not reunite with the shell. The shell contracted to become the present diminutive devastated planet Mars which we currently waste billions to ‘explore’. The solid core, now called Mercury, interacted with Venus for several centuries (Figure 6) and then both settled into their current orbits, where planetary scientists believe (and teach) they have been for 4.6 billion years! In the Bible the planets involved were termed sinning angels and although He used them to perform this greatest miracle, were sentenced by Jehovah, not to Hell as told for Lucifer (Venus) in Isaiah 14:15, but as stated in the the Greek Septuagint, to tartarus, places of restraint, that is, their current orbits, no longer a threat to the Earth.


  • Venus is a proto-planet comprising only the heavy elements that will become its core and mantle. Sulfur is jetting from millions of small domes,  crystallizing to form the lower cloud layer. Sulfur dominates the lower atmosphere, in the form of CS, which was mistaken for CO2 in Pioneer Venus data because they have the same molecular weight
  • Mars is the collapsed outer shell of a planet that was full of life 6,000 years ago, all of which was blasted to the Earth and completely covers the Earth.
  • Zircons found everywhere on Earth were blasted from Mars and are a measure of the ages of Mars which is 700 million years older than Earth
  • Mars tidal drag produced all of the granite on Earth, raised the continents and moved them to their current positions between 3687 and 687 BC
  • Mercury is the former solid core of the original living planet Mars. Its craters are due to impact of rocks blasted from Mars falling toward the Sun
  • Lithospheres with raised mass anomalies rotate independently of their mantles due to the tidal drag of a nearby planets.
  • Jupiter is a solid highly deuterated Methane Gas Hydrate (MGH) planet with the full complement of known element abundances. Explosive impacts on its surface produce the terrestrial planets. The fact that MGH is 80% water explains the origin of water on Earth except that blasted to Earth from Mars.

Enter your favorite planet in the search box and discover more than is in all your textbooks – And its all Free 

Isaiah 65:17 (KJV)  For, behold, I create new heavens and a new earth: and the former shall not be remembered, nor come into mind.


Insight into Mars

•December 4, 2018 • Comments Off on Insight into Mars

Fig. 1. Egyptian drawing of the solid iron core ready for ejection from Mars through what they called the ‘double doors’, the Valles Marineris.

Mars was full of beautiful life forms as recently as 3687 BC and was in a Venus-like orbit with ample sunlight. At that date it was deflected by proto-Venus into an orbit crossing that of the Earth. From this orbit It was repeatedly captured in a geostationary orbit of the Earth for 14.4-years and released for 15.6-years on the vernal equinox by the alignments of Venus, Moon and Sun. This 30-year cycle was repeated ninety-nine times. During this Vedic period all the life resources of Mars were blasted to the Earth by convulsions when it passed through alignments with the Moon or the Sun and Moon combined.

Mars escaped this orbit each time when the solid iron core was ejected. It zoomed around the Earth to the East in a slingshot maneuver and caught up to the shell of the planet which drifted west over the Middle East with a gaping hole  and caught up to it in eight days and reentered. The solid core exited and reentered through the Valles Marineris. At the last encounter the solid core was deflected by proto-Venus and did not recombine with the outer shell, which then collapsed in on itself and is now the diminutive Mars,only a shell of its former self, and entered its current distant orbit only 2,700-years ago. The solid core interacted with (still) proto-Venus and the two, currently called Venus and Mercury, settled into their current orbits.

As a result, the vegetation, rock, soil, salt, atmosphere, oceans on Mars in 3687 BC were completely blasted to the Earth, leaving Mars a desolate place. The search for microscopic life and the idea of terra-forming Mars are ludicrous. The Valles Marineris will surely show signs of the tens of ninety-nine ejections and reentries, extending from the surface deep into the liquid core. Due to over ten thousand convulsions there will be much more heat coming out of Mars than expected. Unfortunately, evolutionist academia wants you to believe the entire solar system is 4.6 billion years old, so they continue to interpret all data from the planets in these terms. That is why they cannot interpret Pioneer Venus and Juno data.

Fig. 2 Valles Marineris as seen when priori-Mars orbited Earth

Fig. 3. The Eye of Ra hieroglyph, An obvious image of Valles Marineris with the core exiting

In the Pepi I Meryre (“beloved of Ra”) funerary epic the Valles Marineris was termed the “double doors” and states specifically that it took eight days for the core (Hathor) to close the distance and recombine with the shell. This was observed by ninety-nine generations of mankind. The Egyptians celebrated these releases with the Sed Festivals, every 30 years. The passing of the shell over the Middle East at each release was the origin of the Jewish Passover, which is celebrated at the vernal equinox for eight days. The Vedic Aryans celebrated a nine-nights festival and the Persian new year Nowroz, (nine nights) is also celebrated at the vernal equinox.

There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy.