Large Craters on Jupiter

Fig. 1. Magnetic field anomalies on the solid MGH Jupiter, marking ancient impacts.

The Juno Radio Science (gravity) experiment is indicating a large “stable” homogeneous mass distribution within Jupiter out to approximately 0.972 RJ rather than the small, ten to twenty Earth-mass rocky-iron core required in the ‘gas giant’ hypothesis to quickly attract all the hydrogen and helium gases before they escaped the nascent solar system. In addition, medium scale variations in the gravity data are being interpreted as due to mass atmospheric ‘flows’. Coincidentally(?), Juno MAG data suggests four large roughly circular anomalies in the surface magnetic field in the same areas.

Impacts on the nominal composition of Jupiter, highly deuterated Methane Gas Hydrate, (CH4)4(H2O)23, produce powerful fusion explosions and the heat of the subsequent sustained fusion reactions on the solid surface of Jupiter has ‘melted’ considerable Methane Gas Hydrate in the area allowing vast amounts of methane to escape. As a result, the large craters are partially filled with pure water. In the cyclic catastrophism model, both gravity and MAG anomalies mark large basins or flooded palimpsests produced by ancient impact explosions, each of which ejected sufficient mass to produce one of the terrestrial planets.

The solid MGH body of Jupiter cannot generate a magnetic field, but due to the uniformly distributed abundance of iron in the form of dust particles, ~318 times the mass of the iron in the Earth, it acts as a large, weak permanent magnet with its field induced a the stream of 1032 4.98 MeV /second light helium ions known as helions circling ~35,000 km above the equator. This enormous flux of helions generate Jupiter’s external magnetic field. Close to the surface, the magnetic field of Jupiter is influenced by the field induced in the solid interior. At the locations of the large craters, entire water-filled palimpsests have lost all their iron, therefore the induced magnetic field anomalies measured by the Juno MAG instrument correspond to the gravity anomalies.

Scientists trying to explain the correlations of magnetic and gravitational fields have generated separate models intended to show the ‘flows’ in the atmosphere produce the measured gravity anomalies and deeper flows in the putative deeper, conductive hydrogen layers, generate magnetic field anomalies at the same locations (see: Constraining Jupiter’s internal flows using Juno magnetic and gravity measurements, by E. Galanti et al. Geophysical Research Letters)…”that combines both fields to constrain the depth-dependent flow field inside Jupiter. This method is based on a mean-field electrodynamic balance that relates the flow field to the anomalous magnetic field, and geostrophic balance that relates the flow field to the anomalous gravity field.”  Dozens of variables and functions in these models are being ‘adjusted’ to match a proposed model. This computer modeling is not thinking, it is merely mathematical tinkering to justify long outdated ideas, such as the ‘gas giants’.

No problem can be solved from the same level of consciousness that created it.      Einstein

~ by Angiras on September 9, 2017.

 
%d bloggers like this: