NASA Juno MIssion Will Prove Earth Origin

Earth’s Explosive Birth

The earth was born out of a high energy impact on Jupiter, which initiated a nuclear fusion fireball thousands of times the size of the giant planet itself.  We are here today because that event occurred about 4 billion years ago. We know about it because many beings on Earth observed and recorded the similar birth of proto-Venus only 6,000 years ago.  In fact, this is the process by which all terrestrial planets are born.  Not only does this prove that Jupiter is a solid planet, but also that it incorporated essentially all the heavy elements present in the nascent solar system.

Methane Gas Hydrate

A number of factors suggest that Jupiters composition is solid methane-gas-hydrate (MGH), a well-studied phase of water which forms under conditions of low temperature and high pressure.  Although primarily water, this phase forms cavities as it freezes, which encapsulate ‘foreign’ molecules or atoms (a clathrate), most commonly methane.  Interestingly, an ample supply of ‘foreign’ material is necessary for its formation , otherwise the cavities collapse, reverting to ordinary ice.  The cavities are of varying sizes, capable of incorporating all of the heavy elements in the periodic table. An excellent tutorial on MGH can be found at MGH tutorial.  Although Saturn is also an MGH planet, its low density (0.7) as compared to Jupiter’s (1.33) indicates that Jupiter incorporated essentially all the heavy elements in the nascent solar system.

Proto-Venus’ Explosive Birth

The magnitude of the fireball that contracted to become proto-Venus (its not yet completed forming) was so great that the Rig Veda described its shape.  This implies the impact of a large body into the unlimited hydrogen (and deuterium) present in the body of Jupiter resulted in an enormous nuclear fusion explosion which exponentially magnified its energy. Moreover, a very gradually diminishing fusion furnace in the crater, manifested as a flaming jet of hot gases, formed the Galilean moons, the main belt asteroids and the trans-Neptunian objects over the last 6,000 years. Although the mass ejection recently ceased, as evidenced by the termination of the slowing of Jupiter’s rotation (~1930), currently interpreted as a monotonic ‘drift of the GRS, the continuing heat generation is still driving the Jupiter’s temperature excess, the Great Red Spot and the latitudinal wind bands.  The point source of the driving energy, in the otherwise solid frozen planet, is disguised by the large mass of heavy elements rising from the crater, cooling, forming compounds and crystals before reaching the cloud-tops, creating a ‘heat-blanket’ of colored but unidentifiable material.

What Will Juno Find?

Juno orbit at Jupiter

NASA has launched a new probe, Juno, toward Jupiter, because its Galileo and Cassini missions have not answered many questions about the giant planet.  The probe will be placed in a highly eccentric orbit which will allow it to fly between the cloud-tops and the inner radiation belt as close as possible to the surface from pole to pole during each orbit, making it possible to cover the entire planet in 33 orbits.  The long wavelength radiometer will likely get no signal from the MGH surface because it is very cold.  The really exciting find will come when Juno passes close to the crater, because a continual fusion reaction is still burning within it.  All the radiometer signals will spike at about 22 degrees South Latitude and considerably West of the Great Red Spot because the rapid eastward rotation of the planet (1 revoluion per 9.9 hours) ‘drags’ the rising column of gases rising from the crater to the West.  At the same time the microwave signals spike,  a relatively abrupt change in the velocity of the probe, used to detect gravitational anomalies, will indicate the mass void of the crater itself. It would be wise for Juno mission planners to allocate time for additional orbits once the crater is localized, in order to fly directly over it, because the planned orbits are displaced by some 12 degrees Longitude.

What Will NASA Report?

It is difficult to imagine how NASA scientists might manage to misinterpret this data, but because the entire ‘community’ is convinced, to a man, that Jupiter is a hydrogen ‘gas giant’ and consequently that the GRS is a ‘storm’, the danger still exists.  I suspect the ‘anomalous data’ discussed herein will be secreted from the public while they search for an explanation consistent with the ‘accepted’ or ‘standard’ theory.   I am forwarding this blog post to the NASA principal investigators at the date of its publication in order to establish provenance of the ideas present herein and to forewarn them as to what to expect .  Unfortunately, we all have to wait until 2016 before the probe reaches its target.  NASA engineers have done spectacular jobs on mission after mission. The only failing comes in the preconceived notions of the scientists that interpret the data.

The Greek Myth of Venus’ Birth

In the story of Athena’s (Venus) birth, Zeus (Jupiter) lay with Metis, the goddess of crafty thought and wisdom (an invisible impacting body), but he immediately feared the consequences. It had been prophesied that Metis would bear children more powerful than the sire, even Zeus himself.  In order to forestall these dire consequences, Zeus (Jupiter) “swallowed her down all of a sudden.”  But he immediately experienced an enormous headache, so Hephaestus (a god of fire), cleaved Zeus’s head with an axe. Athena (Venus) leaped from Zeus’s (Jupiter’s) head, fully grown and armed, with a shout — and pealed to the broad sky her clarion cry of war. And Mother Gaia (Earth) trembled.

~ by Angiras on May 2, 2012.

4 Responses to “NASA Juno MIssion Will Prove Earth Origin”

  1. Matt,
    The composition of Jupiter is 75% water in the form of methane-gas-hydrates. When a planet-creating impact occurs, the heavy elements blasted into space condense to form the hot proto-planet, as is Venus today. However most of the material blasted from that impact on Jupiter, 6,000 years ago (BP) is now water in the form of snowflakes, floating invisibly in the inner solar system, some collecting in the upper atmosphere of proto-Venus and some being collected by the existing planets like the Earth. That water is the source of the hundreds house-sized comets per day spotted by Louis Frank in the NASA Polar satellite UV images. When proto-Venus cools down it will gradually collect this water on its surface to form its oceans. This process ensures that the terrestrial planets will have oceans on their surfaces.
    Short period comets are not spheres of ice with a dark covering. They are rocky bodies blasted from priori-Mars when it orbited the Earth between 3700 and 700 BC. Bodies from deeper inside this planet were too hot to contain water, and are called near-earth-asteroids (NEAs) but the near-surface rocks contained aquifers. Comets are merely these rocks, which when heated by sunlight, eject a small amount of water from the aquifers. The water freezes in space and allows the rocky bodies, which would otherwise not be visible, to be seen. There is very little water in the comets and the oceans did not come from volcanoes.
    Priori-Mars lost all of its water to the Earth between 3700 and 700 BC, then left the vicinity of the Earth when its solid iron core exited through what is now called the Valles Marineris (on Mars) to become the ‘planet’ Mercury. This miraculous rejuvenation of the Earth is incomprehensible to modern academia, the ‘scoffers’ in: 2 Peter 3:3-7.

  2. […] NASA Juno MIssion Will Prove Earth Origin ( […]

  3. Dale, One catastrophist (Emilio Spedicato of U of Bergamo) has speculated that a planet-sized body with a satellite passed close to Earth and its satellite was captured by the Earth, perhaps at the Younger Dryas. This is a more conventional way of explaining a capture, which does not require an ‘energy sink’. And that after some 5,000 years the same planet crashed into Jupiter causing the Little Bang out of which proto-Venus was born. I have always believed it was a rogue asteroid from outside the solar system, perhaps ‘steered’ to exactly the right spot by a higher power who knew exactly the whole series of subsequent events that rejuvenated the Earth, and then sent the debris (Mercury, Mars, and Venus) to safe stable places in the system. I used to think all of the energy had to be supplied by the kinetic energy of the impacting body, but the realization that a nuclear fusion explosion resulted from the impact, lessens the required size and/or the velocity of the impactor.
    According to one paper, the largest S-L 9 fragment, G, was only 1 km in diameter and had a density of only 0.25 at impact, but I maintain that several of these fragments penetrated the atmosphere, struck the surface and initiated fusion explosions. This stems from the appearance of the brightest radiation, called the ‘main events’, which exhibited the spectra of a number of heavy elements never before observed on Jupiter and more significantly, did not appear above the clouds until 6 minutes after the impact. This suggests that the larger fragments struck the MGH surface, triggering a nuclear explosion, maybe 100 megatons, the equivalnt to a large man-made bomb, and the resulting ‘mushroom’ cloud required six minutes to rise through the atmosphere above the cloud-tops. Amazingly, the ‘accepted’ reason given by Mac Low was that the main events were caused by the atoms or molecules from the initial brightning, due to the fragments passing through the thin atmosphere before entering the cloud tops, falling into the denser atmosphere. Upon hearing that explanation, Gene Shoemaker himself said “ridiculous”.

  4. John: What kind of body hit Jupiter? If it was solid, where did it come from? ie: If the terrestrial planets are ONLY made this way, then where did this body come from?? IF a comet did it, they why no ejection from Shumaker Levy?? I am curious about this…Thanks

Leave a Reply

%d bloggers like this: