Churyumov meet Gerasimenko

•September 8, 2014 • Leave a Comment
Fig. 1 'Comet' 67P twin nucleus, darker than charcoal. Courtesy ESA

Fig. 1 ‘Comet’ 67P twin nucleus, darker than charcoal. Courtesy ESA

The ESA Rosetta probe is currently orbiting close to 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko, currently imagined to be a comet.  “We’re a bit surprised at just how unreflective the comet’s surface is and how little evidence of exposed water-ice it shows,” said Alan Stern, Alice instrument principal investigator at SWRI.  Planetary scientists still have the idea that comets are large balls of ice that have become coated with ‘dark stuff’ over 4.6 billion years.

Jupiter-Jet Asteroids

Cyclic catastrophism suggests that these bodies are actually the same as the main belt asteroids, in that they formed from a jet of hot gases that had been shooting out of the impact site on Jupiter for only the last six millennia, following the birth of proto-Venus.  Apparently two of these bodies, of obviously different size, collided at low velocity and formed a single one.  The hyphenated name is merely a coincidence. These asteroids were launched in many directions as Jupiter spun rapidly, depending on the vector sum of the jet velocity, Jupiter’s spin  and orbital velocities. As discussed in several previous posts, the most unique and previously undetected class of these same bodies are the Kreutz sungrazers, ejected into orbits which decay until they hit the Sun, 2,000 of which have been detected by SOHO and STEREO since 1995. These are the cause of all sunspots and amazingly all have the same inclination 144 degrees! Unbelievably, the standard model of planetary science is that sunspots are created by some unknown action of the magnetic field from inside the Sun.

These Jupiter-jet asteroids are unique in several ways: (a) because they formed from a stream of hot gases in a weightless environment they are porus, rigid and have a low density 67P’ density is only 0.1  g/cm^3, one tenth that of water; (b) they are comprised of the same elemental abundance as Jupiter, but do not have the physical form, Methane Gas Hydrate (MGH), which requires extremely high pressure and low temperature, but still comprise the entire spectrum of heavy elements in proportion to their published (nucleogenesis) abundances, including iron; (c) because they condense and freeze while still within the magnetic field of Jupiter, they are permanently magnetized, as measured both by close passes to several main belt asteroids and evidenced also by the magnetic polarity of sunspots, in which the spectra of iron are present; (d) they have very low albedos, as has been noted for a few acknowledged main belt asteroids, the Kreutz sungrazers and 67P/C-G; (e) although water is a fundamental component, it is not present in a separate physical form, but is integral to the internal composition of the asteroids.

67P/C-G was originally found by Klim Churyumov, a Ukrainian astronomer whose team conducted a detailed study of the asteroid, which is published on the web.  They went back through a sequence of older plates and discovered a number of changes in its orbit, attributed to the gravitational influences of Jupiter.  They could not have even considered the notion that a collision of two bodies could have also influenced the orbit because the did not know the shape.  The most interesting aspect of this study was the implication that the nucleus of the ‘comet’ is magnetized as suggested in cyclic catastrophism.  This is something that ESA has not yet reported. Quoting Prof. Churyumov: “I think that this pecularity of magnetic fields in the plasma tail of comet 67P is tightly connected with the magnetic properties of the surface layers of the cometary nucleus. I hope that this problem will be successfully solved with the help of the device ROMAP installed on the ROSETTA Lander when it will land on the comet 67P nucleus.” It will be interesting to see how the ESA scientists try to explain a magnetic ‘ball of ice’.

Twins ever differ in their strength and vigor:  Two, even kinsmen, differ in their bounty.  Rg Veda

Will the Sun’s Magnetic Field Reverse? Update

•October 26, 2014 • Comments Off
Sunspot magnetic butterfly  diagram

Sunspot magnetic butterfly diagram Courtesy David Hathaway NASA Marshall


On July 1, I posted this question.  At that date the latest magnetic butterfly diagram was not available. This updated figure shows the magnetic polarity up to 2014. The explanation of why the field changes at the peak of each sunspot cycle is given in the next paragraph. This is not understood by main stream science. The disappointing strength of the latest sunspot cycle brings up this interesting question.  As discussed in a number of previous posts, e.g. the Kreutz Sungrazers, the asteroids ejected from the great jet on Jupiter over the last 6,000 years are still impacting the Sun causing sunspots and the resulting CMEs.  Just as their ‘brother’ main belt asteroids, these bodies contain a unique combination of elements, i.e. a small complement of all heavy elements, including iron and nickel, which mimic the elemental composition, but not the physical structure (Methane Gas Hydrate) of Jupiter itself. Because they coalesced from hot gas while still within the magnetic field of Jupiter they posses remnant magnetism, as has been observed of several main belt asteroids and was a major reason that the Rosetta mission chose ‘comet’ (asteroid) 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko.

As these permanently magnetized asteroids approach the Sun, their south poles become oriented toward the Sun’s north magnetic pole and vice-versa. When they strike the surface of the Sun, this magnetism can be detected in the resulting sunspots by earth telescopes using spectroscopy and polarimetry.  Because the stream of asteroids originated from Jupiter, their orbits change inclination with an eleven-year cycle.  This results in the impacts in the Sun’s southern hemisphere preceding the impacts in its northern hemisphere. The diagram, which shows the effects of the impacting bodies within 30 degrees of the Sun’s equator (because the stream is limited to that inclination), changing the magnetic field south of the equator before the north.  The field at the poles show the Sun’s dipole field. It shows the Sun’s dipole field changing at the sunspot max in the previous cycles. However, the current weak sunspot cycle has not yet changed the dipole field of the Sun, because sufficient opposing magnetic flux has not yet been delivered to the Sun.

This is beautifully illustrated in a magnetic butterfly diagram, originated by David Hathaway of NASA Marshall, shown in Figure 1.  The magnetic fields at mid-latitudes represent the influx due to the impacting asteroids, which only impact at latitudes less than about 30 degrees, while the magnetic fields at the very top and bottom show the dipole field of the Sun.  Note that the dipole field is overwhelmed at the maximum of asteroid input flux and becomes reversed at that time.

The weak sunspot maximum which characterizes the current cycle raises the question as to whether the Sun’s magnetic field will reverse.  Or it may just be strong enough to cancel out the existing field. I maintain that this effect proves that the Suns magnetic field is superficial and not of great significance to the Earth.  However the weakness of sunspot activity can effect Earth’s climate, since the so-called Coronal Mass Ejections heat the Earth, particularly at the poles and pump-up the Earth’s magnetic field, which originates in the superconducting solid core by Faraday and Lentz ‘laws’.

Astrophysicists currently believe that all this activity, i.e. sunspots and magnetic fields, are generated from within the Sun, but they have great difficulty in explaining how the dipole field could originate in the interior, due to the high temperature and outward flux of energy, which would not allow the required circulation.  Equally puzzling is how such a circulation could be reversed every eleven years. This paper explains the Sun’s dipole magnetic field as superficial –  merely due to the influx of magnetized asteroids – little pieces of Jupiter’s magnetic field, and is not generated in the Sun’s interior.   This also explains why astronomers have difficulty finding other stars with magnetic fields.  Once the stream of asteroids from Jupiter becomes depleted, the Sun’s magnetic field will disappear completely.

The cyclic catastrophism sunspot hypothesis explains: (a) the downward motion of the surface material and its velocity; (b) the cooling of the umbra material; (c) the presence of large amounts of water in sunspots; (d) the periodicity of the sunspots and the butterfly diagram; (e) the origin of the Coronal Mass Ejections; (f) the makeup of the solar corona and its high non-thermal temperature; (g) the origin of the Sun’s magnetic ‘dipole’ field and its reversal; and (h) explains why astronomers have difficulty finding other stars with magnetic fields..


The Origin of Halloween

•October 19, 2014 • Comments Off
The sacred risen land at Mars' north pole, also called Atlantis

The sacred risen land at Mars’ north pole, also called Atlantis surronded by the northern ocean.

During the Vedic Period, from 3700 to 687 BC, the planet Mars approached and orbited the Earth one hundred times. It remained in this special geostationary orbit for about fourteen and a half years. During each orbiting period, called a kalpa in the ancient Rg Veda, it remained stationary in the sky, day and night, passing through phases like the Moon every day, but tidally locked directly above Mt. Kailash, which was known by the Vedic people as ‘Indra’s (Mars) ‘home on Earth’. In that orbit, only 33,500 km above the Earth, it appeared 630 times the area of the full Moon, and everyone on Earth knew names for hundreds of features on its surface, enhanced by virtue of the continuously changing shadows as it slowly revolved like a giant wheel. It was sometimes referred to as Yama-Yami, described as a ‘green man with a red cloak’, referring to the vegetation which abounded on part of Mars during the earlier kalpas, and the volcanic provinces, such as the Tharsis Bulge and the Valles Marineris, which covered the remaining part. Because of its distorted shape, (it was called the dog-star) its north pole (rotation axis) was forced to remain facing the Earth. As a result, tidal effects of the more massive Earth first drew all of the water in its northern hemisphere into a giant northern ocean, which scientists today call the Oceanus Borealis based on evidence of ancient coastlines, which can be seen in the figure. More slowly the same tidal effect melted subsurface rock around its north pole and slowly drew this upward until it rose above the northern ocean, forming a large circular island.  All cultures in the world believed this ‘risen land’ was sacred, watching and waiting for its appearance at the beginning of each kalpa, and had special names for it, such as the Egyptian duat.

Cyclic Catastrophism is based on the fact that Mars only remained in its geostationary orbit for fourteen and a half years at a time and then left the vicinity of the Earth entering a planetary orbit about the Sun for fifteen and a half years. Many cultures believed that when Mars orbited close to the Earth, the souls of the recently deceased soared to the sacred northern island on Mars (figure), and that each time the planet escaped from Earth orbit at the vernal equinox in the fourteenth year of the kalpa, it carried their souls ‘to the gods’ (the stars). This same function was ascribed to the Vedic Yama-Yami and the Egyptian deity Horus.

This led (logically), to the belief that upon the next capture of Mars, people might be able to contact the souls of the deceased. Because the the orbits of the two planets brought them together again around Oct. 31, some fifteen and a half years after its previous release, seances were held at this date. Once the planets were released into their current orbits in 687 BC, all that remained was the date on which the souls of the deceased might be contacted. This led to ‘all saints day’ and to the more popular ‘fun’ day Halloween.

Over millennia, many ancient customs and beliefs have been handed down, the origins of which are now unknown. Indeed, the notion of purgatory may well have may have evolved from the same cyclics of Mars. The souls of those who passed away when Mars was not orbiting close to the Earth, must have had to wait for it return before they could ascend to the sacred land.  Also, because at the end of each encounter the northern ocean overflowed the island, the myth arose of a great island culture called Atlantis which disappeared beneath the sea, (logically) called the Atlantic Ocean.

Simulating the Solar System?

•October 13, 2014 • Comments Off

With the increasing capability of computers, the simulation of the formation of ‘solar systems’ is becoming more popular. However, because of the consensus nature of the community, these attempts are all based on the same assumptions, which are all incorrect.  They all begin with the assumed presence of the giant planets –  but for the wrong reason.  This stems from the misunderstanding that because the hydrogen does not ‘hang around’ more than one or two million years after the star forms, the ‘gas giants’ have to form very quickly.  No one knows how this could have happened, but the studies gloss over this point and concentrate more on the terrestrial planets like the Earth, Mars etc.

The terrestrial planet ‘accretion’ begins typically with a uniform layer of dust extending from Venus’ orbit out to Jupiter, which is incorrect.  A big assumption is then introduced to the effect that the dust in this layer somehow ‘sticks together’ into low mass bodies, which are the most that can be handled by the computer (surprise!). There is no explanation of how dust particles could stick together, because none has ever been found. The simulations then try to estimate whether these slightly larger chunks will collide and stick together or bounce off one another depending on whether they have direct or glancing collisions, but acknowledge that a oblique collision could cause a whole bunch of additional particles that the simulations cannot track. This process goes on and on to produce larger and larger bodies.

A second problem that is glossed over is Mercury.  No simulations can reproduce anything like it, so they usually just skip it, assuming a very low probability collision somehow knocked off the crust and mantle of a normal planet.  A third, more immanent concern is Mars, because we have learned that it had a good amount of water at some time in the past as well as a strong magnetic field from our many probes.  Simulations have trouble coming up with such a small terrestrial planet. Cyclic catastrophism explains both Mars and Mercury which were one planet until 687 BC

Another factor in some simulations is the amount of water in the inner solar system, specfically the Earth. Because the ‘community’ believe that Jupiter and Saturn, and Uranus and Nepture to a lesser degree, are hydrogen and helium, they assume that the only water in the outer solar system is in the form of the small moons of the outer planets and much farther out, in the putative Oort cloud and that water must be transported to the Earth by comets from the Oort cloud, but these are too small to be simulated.


1. There is no mechanism whereby dust particels in the inner solar system can begin to accrete (stick together). That is not how or where the terrestrial planets formed.

2. Scientists have gradually become aware in recent years that getting water to the Earth from its only apparent location, the outer solar system, is a problem.  It is a key point.  but one problem with this idea is that in the currently accepted standard model, there isn’t much water out there, – only small moons of the giant planets, so the simulatins assume there are a lot of icy bodies farther out in the putative Oort cloud, very few of which have even been observed. It is not clear what perturbs them to enter the inner solar system.  In some cases the eccentricities of Jupiter and Saturn are arbitrarily increased in order to do this.

3. Nucleogenesis demands,( and all the tables show), that oxygen and carbon are the 3rd and 4th most abundant elements in the solar system. If this is true, then there should be no water shortage. Amazingly, the only observation that corroborates this abundance is the earth itself and the compositions of the carbonaceous chondrite (CC) meteorites. Considering their total mass, they hardly prove a worthwhile source for the formation of the Earth. The only reason these are used is because the same elements are found in the absorption spectra of the Sun, This is imagined to show the composition of the Sun itself, thereby proving that these little chunks are the material from which the planets accreted.  In fact, this spectrum only shows the content of the Sun’s atmosphere, not its interior and is due to the recent influx of these little bodies ejected from Mars, when it was in the vicinity of the Earth between 3700 and 6987 BC. It does not indicate the composition of the Sun. The same misunderstanding leads to claims that our Sun ‘contains more carbon’ than almost any star we see throughout the Universe. Actually rocks as dense as the CC meteorites cannot form in a weightless environment because the gravity of a planet is required to compress them

4. Nucleagenesis alone shows the bankruptcy of the Gas Giant hypothesis.  Jupiter and Saturn combined account for 92 % of the mass of all the planets. So far, Galileo and Cassini have found essentially no water on either of these giants.  Because of their apparent temperature excesses, combined with the unproveable assumption that nothing unusual has happened in the last 4.5 billion years, Jupiter and Saturn cloud-top temperatures are extrapolated downward to estimated core temperatures of 25,000 K assuming they are gaseous. In spite of the Great Red Spot  and the multiple zonal wind bands, not a single planetary scientist or astrophysicist has suggested that there may have been a recent  impact on Jupiter,


1.  To satisfy the nucleogenesis problem in the solar system, the low average density of the giant planets, the continual presence of methane in their atmospheres, and provide a solid surface on which an impact could take place, the solution is quite obvious.  It is nothing very exotic, just a well-known form of water ice which forms in low temperture, high pressure environments in the presence of ample methane.  Its density is only around 0.7.  Structurally it comprises cells of 12 or more water molecules, each enclosing a methane molecule, or other foreign atoms or molecules.  This characteristic classifies it as a clathrate.  This structure of Jupiter and Saturn alone satisfies the nucleogenesis abundance requirement for the entire solar system, with the water in the MGH supplying oxygen and the methane supplying carbon.  But the average density of Jupiter is much higher than pure MGH, 1.33.  This implies that Jupiter incorporated almost all of the heavy elements in the nascent solar sytem at its inception.  And the well known characteristic of water ice, in the form of snowflakes provides the mechanism for acccretion to begin at the smallest scales.  The heavy elements were present at Jupiters radius in the form of dust particles, provoding  nucleation centers on which the ice crystals formed, as a result the heavy elements were automatically incorporated – a beautiful symbiotic relationship, worthy of the  greatest architect.

2.  Another beauty of this design is that when a large body, attracted by Jupiter’s strong gravity, impacts the giant, it greatly compresses the MGH at the site at the same instant raising the temperature to several hundred million degrees and because of the abundance of H and D (deuterium) triggers a monumental fusion explosion out of which is born a plasma cloud from which a terrestrial planet is formed.  The heavy elements in the plasma  quickly contract, forming the high density core  and mantle, as exemplified by proto-Venus today, while the much more abundant elements that will someday settle on the proto-planet and form its crust, oceans, atmosphere and biosphere as it cools, float invisibly in the inner solar system, and also secretly rain down on the unsuspecting existing planets, like the Earth.

This greatly simplifies the formation of the terresstrial planets. No complex chemistry is required because the plasma cloud from which they formed, Earth included, was an atomic soup, all previous molecules were destroyed and compounds in the planetary interior are concentrated based on their atomic weights and secondarily to their chemical procliviites.  There is no need to run hundreds of simulations with random parameters. This is the way our system was created all explained bya few simple myths.

1 Cor 1:27-29 But God hath chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise; and God hath chosen the weak things of the world to confound the …  mighty;  And base things of the world and things which are despised, hath God chosen, yea, and things which are not to bring to nought things that are:  That no flesh should glory in his presence.



Big Bang Fading Fast

•September 29, 2014 • Comments Off
Fig. 1  Planck dust map in galactic coordinate system.

Fig. 1 Planck dust map in galactic coordinate system.

Using multiple microwave frequency data, the Planck consortium has produced a map of dust in the north and south galactic latitudes greater than 45 degrees, where the dust associated with the Milky Way galaxy is minimal (Figure 1.). They report that in the area of the sky in which the BICEP2 team observed polarization effects (outlined in right, southern panel) the concentration of dust is too thick to see through, implying that the polarization is due to local gravitational waves impinging on the dust, which is in the foreground. Worse yet, the extent of dust is such that it cannot be ignored in any part of the sky.

Fig. 2.  Quadrupole & Octupole alignments with Solar System

Fig. 2. Quadrupole & Octupole alignments with Solar System

Compounding this problem, statistical analyses of the anisotropies in the CMB maps from COBE, WMAP and Planck have found a number of highly improbable alignments with the plane and direction of motion (kinetic vector) of our solar system (Figure 2), with a likelihood or combined probability < 0.008% (On the large-scale anomalies of the microwave sky, C.J. Cobi et al.). Although this problem has been known for a decade, no one has suggested a viable theoretical explanation of these alignments.

The `dust’ surrounding the solar system, combined with these alignments, suggest that an enormous explosion took place in the solar system in recent times, which blasted both a gravitational wave and a cloud of dust which is moving outward from the impact point. Cyclic Catastrophism suggests that this happened 6,000 years ago, when a large body impacted Jupiter (a solid methane gas hydrate body, not a gas giant) producing an enormous fusion explosion (~10³³ j), out of which proto-Venus was born. Assuming this is correct, the `dust’ radiation we see today could be that which was radiated back toward the Earth from the expanding cloud which is obviously moving away from the solar system slower than the speed of light, i.e. radiated from less than 3,000 light years.

In order to render the CMB the same in every direction (isotropic), cosmologists determine the direction of motion of the solar system relative to the cosmic microwave background and make a small correction (deboosting) for it. This is done by finding the warmest point in the CMB, where a slight `blue-shift’ makes the CMB a tiny bit warmer. However, the same effect would be created by the motion of the solar system relative to the blast wave from Jupiter. The implication of this explanation is that the entire sky, full of tiny temperature anisotropies may not be the cosmic microwave background from the Big Bang at all, but merely the result of the recent blast on Jupiter. This cloud would likely have signs of polarization because of the powerful gravitational impulse from the blast, 5-6 AU distant, described in Greek myth as: “When Pallas Athene (Young Athene or Proto-Venus) was born, the Earth round about cried fearfully.” One advantage of this hypothesis is that it can be validated by the Juno probe due to begin detailed analyses of the interior of Jupiter in mid-2016, which, Cyclic Catastrophism maintains, will detect a nuclear furnace still burning in the Venus impact crater, creating the Great Red Spot and Jupiter’s temperature excess, which is limited to its atmosphere.

1 Cor 2:6-7  We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or the rules of this age, who are coming to nought. No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.

“Blessed are you when people insult you, persecute you and falsely say all kinds of evil against you because of me. Rejoice and be glad, because great is your reward in heaven, for in the same way they persecuted the prophets who were before you.”

Far Beyond the princes of The World

•September 12, 2014 • Leave a Comment

threeplanetsLast evening I decided to read from one of my library books – a choice of “The Theory of Everything” by Stephen Hawking or “Cycles of Time” by his associate Roger Penrose, both of whom rattle on interminably, imagining nonsensical, multiple universes, including dark matter and dark energy. Then, suddenly realizing how much more I have learned than these two dark ‘princes’ of the universes, decided to pick up my old Bible instead, which opened prophetically to 1 Corinthians 2.

“1 Corinthians 2:7  But we speak the wisdom of God in a mystery, even the hidden wisdom, which God ordained before the world unto our glory: Which none of the princes of this world knew: for had they known it, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory. But as it is written, Eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither have entered into the heart of man, the things [knowledge] which God hath prepared for them that love him.

We speak wisdom among them that are mature: yet not the wisdom of this world, nor of the princes of this world, that come to nought: But we speak of the secret wisdom of God, even the hidden wisdom, which God destined for our glory before time began. Now we have received, not the spirit of the world, but the spirit which is of God; that we might know the things that are freely given to us of God. But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned. The spiritual man makes judgements about all things, but he himself is not subject to any man’s judgement: For who has known the mind of the Lord, that he may instruct him.”

My little cyclic catastrophism epistles reveal the hidden knowledge of the Lord’s creation of mankind and his use of Mars, Venus and Mercury to prepare the Earth for our expansion over a period of 3,000 years.  As a result of His ‘opening of a door’, a great mass of cosmic knowledge has been revealed.  One-hundred amazing captures and releases of Mars (the number 100 having the Biblical meaning of completeness), and the knowledge they convey  concerning the cosmogony and makeup of the planets, are not presented herein to convince any of the ‘evolutionist’ (read athiest) scientists of the world, who are coming to nought.  Read Peleh: Hidden Knowledge, by John Ackerman.

Big Bang, Little Bang

•August 27, 2014 • Leave a Comment
Fig. 1 WMAP map of Cosmic Microwave Background

Fig. 1 WMAP map of Cosmic Microwave Background

Big Bang

Hundreds of cosmologists have been studying what is called the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB), thought to be the glow from the first light in the universe, a backgound of the entire sky in the form of a near-perfect black-body curve (Physics 101) now red-shifted to a temperature of 2.7255 Kelvins.  Superimposed on this microwave sky they have detected small temperature anisotropies (defined as ΔT/T, which are 0.001 % (mK) or smaller) across the entire sky (Figure 1.), These small angular anisotropies are averaged over the entire sky, in the form of an angular power spectrum, each peak of which has supposedly been linked to a number of cosmological parameters, such as the Hubble Constant, the age of the universe and the mass of normal matter, the most controversial of which is a sudden hyper-fast expansion of the universe just after the Big Bang, called Inflation.  Several cycles (Fig. 2) have been linked to the effects of dark matter and dark energy, but only based on their ‘observed’ actions – clumping and uniform expansion, respectively. Unfortunately science is not even close to determining the true nature of these ‘dark things’.

Fig. 2 Angular power spectrum of Plank CMB map

Fig. 2 Angular power spectrum of Plank CMB map

WMAP and Plank satellites have produced what are published as amazing results shown in Figure 2.  This is the power spectrum of the small angle anisotropies, i.e. the angular sizes of the spots in the sky map in Figure 1.

The Solar System?

Fascinated as they have been in the analyses of these huge data sets, cosmologists have had little interest in the solar system, but recently, other analyses of the CMB data sets have revealed a number of unexpected alignments of large scale anisotropies with the solar system.  This is popularly described as a violation of the ‘Copernican Principle’, that the Earth has no special place in the universe, but this is not strictly true because Copernicus actually claimed that the Earth revolved around the Sun, which is obviously the center of the solar system. Regardless, the quantative investigation of the CMB is based on the assumption, the cosmological principle, that observations made from Earth can be taken to be generally characteristic of what would be seen from any other point in the Universe at the same epoch.


Fig. 3  Quadrupole & Octupole alignments with Solar System

Fig. 3 Quadrupole & Octupole alignments with Solar System

Figure 3 graphically illustrates these troubling alignments with the solar system.  This is not a plot of the actual sky, it is the result of fitting spherical-harmonic-like functions to the data, which reveal hidden ‘multipoles’, e.g. the dipole, the quadrupole and octupoles, The dipole, currently thought to be well determined, has been removed, It is merely the result of the motion of the Earth relative to the Universe.  Its direction is indicated at the lower left in Figure 3, in which the plane of the ecliptic is the solid line.  The affect of these multipole alignments in Figure 3 shows up as the irregular points in the power spectrum, the shaded area at the lowest l values (largest angles) in Figure 2.

The Axis of Evil

Specifically, the suspect alignments in Figure 3 are: (a) the quadrupole and octupole  are close to one another; (b) they are orthogonal to the ecliptic plane; (c) the normals to the four planes defining the quadrupole (1) and octupole (3) are aligned with the dipole (direction of motion of the Earth) and with the equinox; (d) the ecliptic threads between a hot and a cold spot separating three strong extrema from three weak ones.  From a cosmological perspective, the probabilities that all these alignments could occur is estimated at 0.008% !  These highly improbable alignments have been dubbed “the axis of evil”.

The most obvious implication of these alignments is that a highly energetic event occurred in the solar system in the recent past, and a small amount of the radiated energy is being reflected by ‘local’ dust in the  galaxy. This energy would be superimposed on the true Cosmic Microwave Background.  Cosmologists refer to this as a ‘foreground’ event, meaning that its effect lies between the Earth and the CMB.  Based on the consistency of the power spectrum resulting from the small anisotropies (< 1 degree) shown in Figure 2, the reflected foreground energy is likely be relatively uniform over a broad area but not necessarily over the entire sky, thereby affecting  only the large angle portion of the spectrum.   However, in the last decade no cosmologist has suggested a theory of what could have caused such an event .

The Standard Model of the Solar System

One obvious reason for this lack of theories, is that the ‘standard model’ of the solar system accepted today, uniformitarianism, holds that the solar system has been in its current configuration for 4.6 billion years. This paradigm obviously discounts any solar system event of the magnitude required to affect the large scale CMB anisotropies. In contrast to this unprovable assumption that ‘nothing has happened’, cyclic catastrophism, the subject of this blog, is based on ancient texts in every library in the world which, when taken at face value, are observations of cosmic events easily interpreted in terms of modern astrophysics and geophysics. As confident as cosmologists are of being able to look back in time via red shifts and general relativity, their tools focus on extremely distant events, while the differential equations currently used for short-term predictions of the positions of planets in the solar system are of no use in discovering past instances of catastrophic events involving high energy dissipation.

The Little Bang

The 3,000 year period of Cyclic Catastrophism was triggered by a highly energetic impact on Jupiter about 6,000 years BP, which released an estimated 10³³ joules into the solar system, thus the Little Bang.  Proto-Venus, born from this great impact became the physical agent by which this enormous energy propagated into the inner solar system.  At that date the solar system comprised only two living planets, Earth and Mars, the latter in a Venus-like orbit inside that of the Earth. The magnitude of the proposed impact explosion on Jupiter suggests that: (a) Jupiter is a low average density, solid planet and; (b) The terrestrial planets were each created by unique high energy impacts on Jupiter and therefore have unique ages. The application of straight-forward astrophysical/geophysical concepts leads to the conclusion that Jupiter and Saturn are giant, solid, frozen, incompressible Methane Gas Hydrate (MGH) planets. These formed cold over 50 to 75 million years by the initial sticking together (‘accretion’) of snowflakes, which formed on the surfaces of dust particles at the radius of Jupiter. In this cosmogony the giant planets comprised the original solar system.

Jupiter Saturn Interior

As suggested by Jupiter’s average density, 1.33, compared to Saturn’s, 0.7, (the density of pure MGH), Jupiter incorporated almost the entire complement of heavy elements in the nascent solar system as it accreted. The currently accepted ‘gas giant’ hypothesis, that Jupiter and Saturn, known to account for 92% of the mass of the planets, comprise primarily H and He, is in direct opposition to the theoretical (published) elemental abundance of the solar system based on stellar nucleogenesis, which demands that oxygen and carbon are the third and fourth most abundant elements. MGH, comprising primarily water and methane molecules, is consistent with these abundances, as is the continued presence of methane gas in their atmospheres, which is continually being released by fusion reactions in the impact crater. Methane Gas Hydrates are common on Earth in niches where high pressure, low temperature and methane are present, consistent with the proposed conditions within the giant planets in the outer solar system. The known clathrate structure of MGH comprises rigid cells of twelve or more water molecules, each encapsulating a methane molecule or other foreign atoms/molecules.

The cosmological implications of the Little Bang  are primarily stated in the Rig Veda and Greek myth. The Rig Veda states that Aditi (proto-Venus) was born from Dyauspitar, the Heaven Father (Jupiter), describing the rebounded plasma cloud (mrttnda) as having the shape of an elephant. Given that Jupiter remains between 4 and 6 AU from the Earth (the AU is the distance from the Sun to the Earth), the identification of such a shape suggests that a plasma cloud > 4 million km in diameter rebounded from the impact. Even more significant, Greek myth suggests a comparable magnitude explosion in independent astrophysical terms: “When Pallas Athene (Young Athena or proto-Venus) was born, the earth round about cried fearfully” – implying that the entire Earth reacted to a gravitational impulse initiated by the impact at a distance > 4 AU, over half an hour later.

Fusion-Boosted Impact on Jupiter
The further application of astrophysics to these observations and others (see below), suggests that high kinetic energy impacts on Jupiter momentarily raise local surface temperatures to several 100 million K, triggering enormous nuclear fusion explosions, exponentially magnifying the impact energy beyond any currently conceivable level and thereby have created the terrestrial planets. The fusion explosions are fueled by the compression of already densely packed H, D (p-p), C, N, and O in the form of water, methane and ammonia molecules at the impact site, and fusion has been maintained in the crater by the high atmospheric pressure at depths > 600 km below the cloud-tops.

Fig. 4 A 9th century AD drawing of the planets, with Jupiter and plume at upper left.

Fig. 4 A 9th century AD drawing of the planets, with Jupiter and plume at upper left.

Reinforcing the enormous power and uniqueness of the ‘recent’ impact on Jupiter, a combination of ancient and modern observations further suggest that a significant source of energy, initiated by the primary impact event, is still manifest on Jupiter, indeed, it is the source of every feature of the giant planet to this day. The impact explosion initiated a continuing fusion conflagration in the crater manifested as a great jet of hot gases which continued to shoot millions of km into space, only gradually diminishing over some six millennia. Evidence of the magnitude and longevity of the jet comes in the form of a drawing of the planet Jupiter, the upper left figure in an Arabic epistle dated around the 9th century AD. The purpose of which was to classify comets, given clear planetary charasteristics.  The upper left hand figure in annotated ‘bearded’ ‘having the temperment of Jupiter’  The other drawings illustrate the appearances of the other planets, all of which appear to show the lasting effects of cyclic catastriphism, having ended only 1,600 years prior. This epistle, incidentally, suggests that the reknown Arabic culture of Baghdad at that date had astronomical telescopes (Figure 4).

Potential Effect of the Jupiter Explosion on the CMB

The initial orbit of proto-Venus,which rebounded from Jupiter into the inner solar system implies that the impacting body passed through the system and impacted the Sun-facing side of Jupiter releasing ~ 10³³ joules, the binding energy of the Earth. The resulting explosion created a gravitational/heat wave with origin at the impact point 6,000 years BP. The alignment of the quadrupole and octopole moments normal to the kinetic vector suggests that the impact blast was oriented close to the direction of motion of the solar system, indeed, this may have been a factor in the relative velocity of the impacting (galactic?) body. The jet, marked by the location of the Great Red Spot at 22 degrees south latitude is consistent with the greater heat in the southern ecliptic hemisphere, but the instantaneous expanding gravitational/heat wave would probably been directed opposite to the velocity of the impactor, that is, close to the kinetic vector, the direction of solar system motion relative to the Universe. It would probably not have expanded the the opposite direction, due to the absorption of the wave in that direction by the body of Jupiter. The primary effect of the gravitational/radiation wave in the CMB data today would be the heat reflected from cosmic dust, an additive foreground surface, ~ 3000 light years distant with a dipole distribution close to but not exactly aligned with the kinetic vector. Such a large-scale asymmetry might effect the large angle values of many points and thereby influence the power spectrum at low-l values.


The motion of the solar system relative to the CMB results in a well known dipole temperature anisotropy, producing both an aberration and a modulation, a boosting, of the CMB temperature anisotropies in the direction of motion. The process of correcting for this slight temperature increase in the direction of motion is called deboosting. The exact direction of the temperature boost is considered well established over some 30 years, and has been ‘confirmed’ based on the full sky data sets WMAP and Plank (Plank 2013 results. XXVII. Doppler boosting of the CMB: Eppur si muove). However, any foreground effect from the Jupiter explosion, has been present for six millennia.

Assuming the temperature and direction of the proposed blast from the impact on Jupiter was oriented close to, but not exactly aligned with, the kinematic vector, it could be causing an error in the exact direction of β‖ , the CMB dipole direction used for the deboosting correction. Indeed it is the ‘boosting’ paper cited above (XXVII), which states in Section 7. Conclusions: “tests with component separated maps shown in Figure 5. provide a strong indication that our 217 GHz map has slight residual foreground contamination.”

The primary affect of the proposed expanding wave from the explosion on Jupiter today, would be a low-level ΔT/T increase over a broad area in the general direction of motion of the solar system, but not exactly in the direction of motion of the solar system and possiblya corresponding lesser foreground of ΔT/T or even an absence of  foregroud heating in the opposite direction due to the blocking of the blast wave by the body of Jupiter. This could.  This opens up the possibility that the  true kinetic vector might better be based on the orientation of the low temperature point in the direction opposite the kinetic vector, thereby aiding in determining a foreground correction in the direction of the true kinetic vector, before the deboosting is applied. The reduction of the foreground effect could improve the low-l temperature anisotropy power spectrum thereby clarifying the ‘initial conditions’, the dominance of dark energy and, combined with the polarization data, potentially confirm a gravitational wave contribution to CMB.

NASA Juno Probe Will Confirm Jupiter Explosion

In 2016 Juno will enter a highly eccentric polar orbit which passes between Jupiter’s cloud-tops and its radiation belts around perigee to study its gravitational and radiation fields during 33 orbits as the planet rotates. The coverage of the entire planet will take about a year. The gravity system is designed to use Doppler changes in the probe’s transmissions to determine Jupiter’s internal structure – currently imagined to comprise hydrogen and helium with a ~ 25 earth-mass core deep inside the planet. If, as proposed herein, Jupiter instead comprises a solid frozen methane gas hydrate surface some 600 km below the cloud-tops, three enormous craters associated with the creations of Mars (4.6 by), Earth (3.9 by) and proto-Venus (6,000 y) BP, should be sensed. Although the ancient craters, from the creation of Mars and Earth, may be partially filled with water – the ultimate product of melted MGH, the still active proto-Venus crater will certainly be detected by this experiment at 22 degrees south latitude, some 5,000 km to the east of the Great Red Spot, due to Jupiter’s rapid rotation. Juno also carries a number of microwave radiometer channels to study emissions from different depths in the putative gaseous interior. Several of these channels should detect strong emissions from the fusion furnace coincident with the location of the Venus crater and perhaps the rising plume.

Although some cosmologists might look forward to the Juno data as corroboration of a potential foreground source which is masking large scale CMB anisotropies, a very real possibility exists that, if the ‘ludicrous’ predictions proposed herein are indeed observed, they will be ‘interpreted’ by the Juno team as instrument malfunctions, and discarded. Since both disciplines, essentially all of academia, hold strong ‘evolutionist’ and elitist views not readily or frankly communicated to the public, there remains a strong possibility that the predicted features on Jupiter will be declared irrelevant, or even consistent with the current ‘standard model’ of the solar system.

This is exactly what occurred with the Pioneer Venus (PV) mission, in which radiometer data from all four probes and the orbiter showed that Venus radiates (on both day and night sides) an amazing 20 W/m2 more than it receives from the Sun. However, twenty-six years later the standard (Pollack) model remains that the high surface temperature, 872 F (467 C), is due to a greenhouse effect supplemented by an undefined ‘global dynamics’ – which incidentally constitutes a primary scientific support of the ‘global warming’ scare on Earth.


There are more things in Heaven and Earth than are dreamed of in your philosophy, Horatio.

William Shakespeare

In theory, theory and practice are the same.  In practice, they are not.    Albert Einstein

Eppur Si muove  “And yet it moves.”  Galileo after being forced to recant his idea that the Eareth moves around the Sun




Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 45 other followers