Curiosity Image Verifies Cyclic Catastrophism

•December 13, 2014 • Comments Off
Mt. Sharp formed by numerous equally thick sedimentary deposits inside Gale Crater

Mt. Sharp formed by numerous equally thick sedimentary deposits inside Gale Crater

The NASA Curiosity rover has found that the 5 km high Mount Sharp in the center of Gale Crater is composed of many layers of sedimentary rock, bearing witness to repeated filling and evaporation of Gale Crater. Dr. John Grotzinger stated: “Where there’s now a mountain there may have been a series of lakes.” “The great thing about a lake that occurs repeatedly, over and over, is that each time it comes back it is another experiment to tell you how the environment works.” Michael Meyer, lead scientist of NASA’s Mars Exploration Program stated: “Knowledge we’re gaining about Mars environmental evolution by deciphering how Mount Sharp formed, will also help guide plans for future missions to seek signs of Martian life”.  ‘Consensus scientists’ are no closer to understanding Mars than they were before the first mission.  They are not able to explain the equal thicknesses and similar ages of the many layers, which are due to cyclic catastrophism. The same source that created the Walla Walla rythmite deposits in NW US.

If NASA or ESA wants to find out about Martian life they do not have to go any further than reading these blogs on Cyclic Catastrophism and papers on firmament-chaos.com/recent_papers.html.  Cyclic Catastrophism explains that the many equally thick layers of Mt. Sharp were formed between 3717 and 687 BC when Mars was captured and released one hundred times from a geostationary orbit of the Earth with a period of 30 years.  The 1 cm layers in the image resulted from this exact periodicity. The geostationary encounters were 14.4 years long with intervals of 15.6 years when Mars was released into an orbit of the Sun in order for the remaining water to be equally distributed over the planet and thus available for capture by the Earth in the next cycle. Prior to this period Mars was in a Venus-like orbit and full of life like the Earth is today. Indeed, during these geostationary encounters, Mars lost all of its oceans, atmopsphere, biosphere and many mineral deposits to the Earth.

Planetary science is currently stuck in an evolutionist, uniformitarion paradigm which dictates the interpretation of any data before it is even received.  Thus we were told (Pioneer Venus) that the atmosphere of Venus is all carbon dioxide even though this was not measured below 50 km (because the mass spectrometer input leak was clogged, yeah).  We are told that any life on Mars must be microbial and billions of years old, when ancient texts reveal enormous detail about Mars, and that Jupiter and Saturn are balls of hydrogen, when in fact it they are solid frozen spheres of methane gas hydrate, which in the case of Jupiter, will be revealed in 2016 by Juno but ‘covered up’ when the data shows otherwise.

Valles Marineris as seen when priori-Mars orbited Earth

Valles Marineris as seen when priori-Mars orbited Earth

Eye of Ra hieroglyph

Eye of Ra hieroglyph

Mars left the vicinity of the Earth when its solid iron core, now called Mercury, exited the planet through the enormous fault called Valles Marineris and went into the inner solar system while the outer shell collapsed in on itself and drifted out to its current cold orbit only 2,700 years ago. The Egyptians pictured Mercury as it exited Mars as the ‘Eye of Ra’, which can be seen to be an almost exact rendering of the Valles Marineris on Mars.

1 Cor 2:6-7 We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or the rules of this age, who are coming to nought. No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.

Hot Asthenosphere

•December 11, 2014 • Comments Off
Hot aesthenosphere just below rigid lithosphere

Hot asthenosphere just below rigid lithosphere

The asthenosphere – derived from the Greek asthenes, meaning weak, is the uppermost layer of the Earth’s mantle. Geophysicists only became aware of this thin layer as a result of the theory of plate tectonics, a new idea which they had resisted for decades until the 1960s. The 100 km thick rigid lithosphere, including the crust on which we live, slides easily on the asthenosphere which acts as a bearing. More significantly, the asthenosphere has been found to be ‘anomalously’ hot, even hotter than the lower mantle, accounting for the primary source of heat from volcanoes.  Although of interest to the geological community, they fail to understand the origin of this Hot Asthenosphere.

Cyclic Catastrophism explains that during each (14.4-year) encounter of Mars with the Earth, the mass-moment of Mars, locked onto the Tibetan-Himalayan Complex (Mt. Kailas was Indra’s home on earth) in a geostationary orbit, forcing the lithosphere to rotate about a temporary axis at Hudson Bay at a rate of 360 days per year.  Thus the entire surface of the Earth rotated for a total of 1440-years at a different speed and direction than the interior of the planet. The asthenospere was the smooth bearing that made this possible. The enormous friction between the lithosphere and the deep mantle increased the temperature of the asthenosphere, leaving the Earth warmer for mankind.  During this same period, all the valuable resources of Mars, its oceans, atmosphere, biosphere and innumerable mineral deposits were blasted to the Earth.

Will the Sun’s Magnetic Field Reverse? Update

•October 26, 2014 • Comments Off
Sunspot magnetic butterfly  diagram

Sunspot magnetic butterfly diagram Courtesy David Hathaway NASA Marshall

 

On July 1, I posted this question.  At that date the latest magnetic butterfly diagram was not available. This updated figure shows the magnetic polarity up to 2014. The explanation of why the field changes at the peak of each sunspot cycle is given in the next paragraph. This is not understood by main stream science. The disappointing strength of the latest sunspot cycle brings up this interesting question.  As discussed in a number of previous posts, e.g. the Kreutz Sungrazers, the asteroids ejected from the great jet on Jupiter over the last 6,000 years are still impacting the Sun causing sunspots and the resulting CMEs.  Just as their ‘brother’ main belt asteroids, these bodies contain a unique combination of elements, i.e. a small complement of all heavy elements, including iron and nickel, which mimic the elemental composition, but not the physical structure (Methane Gas Hydrate) of Jupiter itself. Because they coalesced from hot gas while still within the magnetic field of Jupiter they posses remnant magnetism, as has been observed of several main belt asteroids and was a major reason that the Rosetta mission chose ‘comet’ (asteroid) 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko.

As these permanently magnetized asteroids approach the Sun, their south poles become oriented toward the Sun’s north magnetic pole and vice-versa. When they strike the surface of the Sun, this magnetism can be detected in the resulting sunspots by earth telescopes using spectroscopy and polarimetry.  Because the stream of asteroids originated from Jupiter, their orbits change inclination with an eleven-year cycle.  This results in the impacts in the Sun’s southern hemisphere preceding the impacts in its northern hemisphere. The diagram, which shows the effects of the impacting bodies within 30 degrees of the Sun’s equator (because the stream is limited to that inclination), changing the magnetic field south of the equator before the north.  The field at the poles show the Sun’s dipole field. It shows the Sun’s dipole field changing at the sunspot max in the previous cycles. However, the current weak sunspot cycle has not yet changed the dipole field of the Sun, because sufficient opposing magnetic flux has not yet been delivered to the Sun.

http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2001/ast15feb_1/

This is beautifully illustrated in a magnetic butterfly diagram, originated by David Hathaway of NASA Marshall, shown in Figure 1.  The magnetic fields at mid-latitudes represent the influx due to the impacting asteroids, which only impact at latitudes less than about 30 degrees, while the magnetic fields at the very top and bottom show the dipole field of the Sun.  Note that the dipole field is overwhelmed at the maximum of asteroid input flux and becomes reversed at that time.

The weak sunspot maximum which characterizes the current cycle raises the question as to whether the Sun’s magnetic field will reverse.  Or it may just be strong enough to cancel out the existing field. I maintain that this effect proves that the Suns magnetic field is superficial and not of great significance to the Earth.  However the weakness of sunspot activity can effect Earth’s climate, since the so-called Coronal Mass Ejections heat the Earth, particularly at the poles and pump-up the Earth’s magnetic field, which originates in the superconducting solid core by Faraday and Lentz ‘laws’.

Astrophysicists currently believe that all this activity, i.e. sunspots and magnetic fields, are generated from within the Sun, but they have great difficulty in explaining how the dipole field could originate in the interior, due to the high temperature and outward flux of energy, which would not allow the required circulation.  Equally puzzling is how such a circulation could be reversed every eleven years. This paper explains the Sun’s dipole magnetic field as superficial –  merely due to the influx of magnetized asteroids – little pieces of Jupiter’s magnetic field, and is not generated in the Sun’s interior.   This also explains why astronomers have difficulty finding other stars with magnetic fields.  Once the stream of asteroids from Jupiter becomes depleted, the Sun’s magnetic field will disappear completely.

The cyclic catastrophism sunspot hypothesis explains: (a) the downward motion of the surface material and its velocity; (b) the cooling of the umbra material; (c) the presence of large amounts of water in sunspots; (d) the periodicity of the sunspots and the butterfly diagram; (e) the origin of the Coronal Mass Ejections; (f) the makeup of the solar corona and its high non-thermal temperature; (g) the origin of the Sun’s magnetic ‘dipole’ field and its reversal; and (h) explains why astronomers have difficulty finding other stars with magnetic fields..

 

The Origin of Halloween

•October 19, 2014 • Comments Off
The sacred risen land at Mars' north pole, also called Atlantis

The sacred risen land at Mars’ north pole, also called Atlantis surronded by the northern ocean.

During the Vedic Period, from 3700 to 687 BC, the planet Mars approached and orbited the Earth one hundred times. It remained in this special geostationary orbit for about fourteen and a half years. During each orbiting period, called a kalpa in the ancient Rg Veda, it remained stationary in the sky, day and night, passing through phases like the Moon every day, but tidally locked directly above Mt. Kailash, which was known by the Vedic people as ‘Indra’s (Mars) ‘home on Earth’. In that orbit, only 33,500 km above the Earth, it appeared 630 times the area of the full Moon, and everyone on Earth knew names for hundreds of features on its surface, enhanced by virtue of the continuously changing shadows as it slowly revolved like a giant wheel. It was sometimes referred to as Yama-Yami, described as a ‘green man with a red cloak’, referring to the vegetation which abounded on part of Mars during the earlier kalpas, and the volcanic provinces, such as the Tharsis Bulge and the Valles Marineris, which covered the remaining part. Because of its distorted shape, (it was called the dog-star) its north pole (rotation axis) was forced to remain facing the Earth. As a result, tidal effects of the more massive Earth first drew all of the water in its northern hemisphere into a giant northern ocean, which scientists today call the Oceanus Borealis based on evidence of ancient coastlines, which can be seen in the figure. More slowly the same tidal effect melted subsurface rock around its north pole and slowly drew this upward until it rose above the northern ocean, forming a large circular island.  All cultures in the world believed this ‘risen land’ was sacred, watching and waiting for its appearance at the beginning of each kalpa, and had special names for it, such as the Egyptian duat.

Cyclic Catastrophism is based on the fact that Mars only remained in its geostationary orbit for fourteen and a half years at a time and then left the vicinity of the Earth entering a planetary orbit about the Sun for fifteen and a half years. Many cultures believed that when Mars orbited close to the Earth, the souls of the recently deceased soared to the sacred northern island on Mars (figure), and that each time the planet escaped from Earth orbit at the vernal equinox in the fourteenth year of the kalpa, it carried their souls ‘to the gods’ (the stars). This same function was ascribed to the Vedic Yama-Yami and the Egyptian deity Horus.

This led (logically), to the belief that upon the next capture of Mars, people might be able to contact the souls of the deceased. Because the the orbits of the two planets brought them together again around Oct. 31, some fifteen and a half years after its previous release, seances were held at this date. Once the planets were released into their current orbits in 687 BC, all that remained was the date on which the souls of the deceased might be contacted. This led to ‘all saints day’ and to the more popular ‘fun’ day Halloween.

Over millennia, many ancient customs and beliefs have been handed down, the origins of which are now unknown. Indeed, the notion of purgatory may well have may have evolved from the same cyclics of Mars. The souls of those who passed away when Mars was not orbiting close to the Earth, must have had to wait for it return before they could ascend to the sacred land.  Also, because at the end of each encounter the northern ocean overflowed the island, the myth arose of a great island culture called Atlantis which disappeared beneath the sea, (logically) called the Atlantic Ocean.

Simulating the Solar System?

•October 13, 2014 • Comments Off

With the increasing capability of computers, the simulation of the formation of ‘solar systems’ is becoming more popular. However, because of the consensus nature of the community, these attempts are all based on the same assumptions, which are all incorrect.  They all begin with the assumed presence of the giant planets –  but for the wrong reason.  This stems from the misunderstanding that because the hydrogen does not ‘hang around’ more than one or two million years after the star forms, the ‘gas giants’ have to form very quickly.  No one knows how this could have happened, but the studies gloss over this point and concentrate more on the terrestrial planets like the Earth, Mars etc.

The terrestrial planet ‘accretion’ begins typically with a uniform layer of dust extending from Venus’ orbit out to Jupiter, which is incorrect.  A big assumption is then introduced to the effect that the dust in this layer somehow ‘sticks together’ into low mass bodies, which are the most that can be handled by the computer (surprise!). There is no explanation of how dust particles could stick together, because none has ever been found. The simulations then try to estimate whether these slightly larger chunks will collide and stick together or bounce off one another depending on whether they have direct or glancing collisions, but acknowledge that a oblique collision could cause a whole bunch of additional particles that the simulations cannot track. This process goes on and on to produce larger and larger bodies.

A second problem that is glossed over is Mercury.  No simulations can reproduce anything like it, so they usually just skip it, assuming a very low probability collision somehow knocked off the crust and mantle of a normal planet.  A third, more immanent concern is Mars, because we have learned that it had a good amount of water at some time in the past as well as a strong magnetic field from our many probes.  Simulations have trouble coming up with such a small terrestrial planet. Cyclic catastrophism explains both Mars and Mercury which were one planet until 687 BC

Another factor in some simulations is the amount of water in the inner solar system, specfically the Earth. Because the ‘community’ believe that Jupiter and Saturn, and Uranus and Nepture to a lesser degree, are hydrogen and helium, they assume that the only water in the outer solar system is in the form of the small moons of the outer planets and much farther out, in the putative Oort cloud and that water must be transported to the Earth by comets from the Oort cloud, but these are too small to be simulated.

Problems

1. There is no mechanism whereby dust particels in the inner solar system can begin to accrete (stick together). That is not how or where the terrestrial planets formed.

2. Scientists have gradually become aware in recent years that getting water to the Earth from its only apparent location, the outer solar system, is a problem.  It is a key point.  but one problem with this idea is that in the currently accepted standard model, there isn’t much water out there, – only small moons of the giant planets, so the simulatins assume there are a lot of icy bodies farther out in the putative Oort cloud, very few of which have even been observed. It is not clear what perturbs them to enter the inner solar system.  In some cases the eccentricities of Jupiter and Saturn are arbitrarily increased in order to do this.

3. Nucleogenesis demands,( and all the tables show), that oxygen and carbon are the 3rd and 4th most abundant elements in the solar system. If this is true, then there should be no water shortage. Amazingly, the only observation that corroborates this abundance is the earth itself and the compositions of the carbonaceous chondrite (CC) meteorites. Considering their total mass, they hardly prove a worthwhile source for the formation of the Earth. The only reason these are used is because the same elements are found in the absorption spectra of the Sun, This is imagined to show the composition of the Sun itself, thereby proving that these little chunks are the material from which the planets accreted.  In fact, this spectrum only shows the content of the Sun’s atmosphere, not its interior and is due to the recent influx of these little bodies ejected from Mars, when it was in the vicinity of the Earth between 3700 and 6987 BC. It does not indicate the composition of the Sun. The same misunderstanding leads to claims that our Sun ‘contains more carbon’ than almost any star we see throughout the Universe. Actually rocks as dense as the CC meteorites cannot form in a weightless environment because the gravity of a planet is required to compress them

4. Nucleagenesis alone shows the bankruptcy of the Gas Giant hypothesis.  Jupiter and Saturn combined account for 92 % of the mass of all the planets. So far, Galileo and Cassini have found essentially no water on either of these giants.  Because of their apparent temperature excesses, combined with the unproveable assumption that nothing unusual has happened in the last 4.5 billion years, Jupiter and Saturn cloud-top temperatures are extrapolated downward to estimated core temperatures of 25,000 K assuming they are gaseous. In spite of the Great Red Spot  and the multiple zonal wind bands, not a single planetary scientist or astrophysicist has suggested that there may have been a recent  impact on Jupiter,

Solutions

1.  To satisfy the nucleogenesis problem in the solar system, the low average density of the giant planets, the continual presence of methane in their atmospheres, and provide a solid surface on which an impact could take place, the solution is quite obvious.  It is nothing very exotic, just a well-known form of water ice which forms in low temperture, high pressure environments in the presence of ample methane.  Its density is only around 0.7.  Structurally it comprises cells of 12 or more water molecules, each enclosing a methane molecule, or other foreign atoms or molecules.  This characteristic classifies it as a clathrate.  This structure of Jupiter and Saturn alone satisfies the nucleogenesis abundance requirement for the entire solar system, with the water in the MGH supplying oxygen and the methane supplying carbon.  But the average density of Jupiter is much higher than pure MGH, 1.33.  This implies that Jupiter incorporated almost all of the heavy elements in the nascent solar sytem at its inception.  And the well known characteristic of water ice, in the form of snowflakes provides the mechanism for acccretion to begin at the smallest scales.  The heavy elements were present at Jupiters radius in the form of dust particles, provoding  nucleation centers on which the ice crystals formed, as a result the heavy elements were automatically incorporated – a beautiful symbiotic relationship, worthy of the  greatest architect.

2.  Another beauty of this design is that when a large body, attracted by Jupiter’s strong gravity, impacts the giant, it greatly compresses the MGH at the site at the same instant raising the temperature to several hundred million degrees and because of the abundance of H and D (deuterium) triggers a monumental fusion explosion out of which is born a plasma cloud from which a terrestrial planet is formed.  The heavy elements in the plasma  quickly contract, forming the high density core  and mantle, as exemplified by proto-Venus today, while the much more abundant elements that will someday settle on the proto-planet and form its crust, oceans, atmosphere and biosphere as it cools, float invisibly in the inner solar system, and also secretly rain down on the unsuspecting existing planets, like the Earth.

This greatly simplifies the formation of the terresstrial planets. No complex chemistry is required because the plasma cloud from which they formed, Earth included, was an atomic soup, all previous molecules were destroyed and compounds in the planetary interior are concentrated based on their atomic weights and secondarily to their chemical procliviites.  There is no need to run hundreds of simulations with random parameters. This is the way our system was created all explained bya few simple myths.

1 Cor 1:27-29 But God hath chosen the foolish things of the world to confound the wise; and God hath chosen the weak things of the world to confound the …  mighty;  And base things of the world and things which are despised, hath God chosen, yea, and things which are not to bring to nought things that are:  That no flesh should glory in his presence.

 

 

Big Bang Fading Fast

•September 29, 2014 • Comments Off
Fig. 1  Planck dust map in galactic coordinate system.

Fig. 1 Planck dust map in galactic coordinate system.

Using multiple microwave frequency data, the Planck consortium has produced a map of dust in the north and south galactic latitudes greater than 45 degrees, where the dust associated with the Milky Way galaxy is minimal (Figure 1.). They report that in the area of the sky in which the BICEP2 team observed polarization effects (outlined in right, southern panel) the concentration of dust is too thick to see through, implying that the polarization is due to local gravitational waves impinging on the dust, which is in the foreground. Worse yet, the extent of dust is such that it cannot be ignored in any part of the sky.

Fig. 2.  Quadrupole & Octupole alignments with Solar System

Fig. 2. Quadrupole & Octupole alignments with Solar System

Compounding this problem, statistical analyses of the anisotropies in the CMB maps from COBE, WMAP and Planck have found a number of highly improbable alignments with the plane and direction of motion (kinetic vector) of our solar system (Figure 2), with a likelihood or combined probability < 0.008% (On the large-scale anomalies of the microwave sky, C.J. Cobi et al.). Although this problem has been known for a decade, no one has suggested a viable theoretical explanation of these alignments.

The `dust’ surrounding the solar system, combined with these alignments, suggest that an enormous explosion took place in the solar system in recent times, which blasted both a gravitational wave and a cloud of dust which is moving outward from the impact point. Cyclic Catastrophism suggests that this happened 6,000 years ago, when a large body impacted Jupiter (a solid methane gas hydrate body, not a gas giant) producing an enormous fusion explosion (~10³³ j), out of which proto-Venus was born. Assuming this is correct, the `dust’ radiation we see today could be that which was radiated back toward the Earth from the expanding cloud which is obviously moving away from the solar system slower than the speed of light, i.e. radiated from less than 3,000 light years.

In order to render the CMB the same in every direction (isotropic), cosmologists determine the direction of motion of the solar system relative to the cosmic microwave background and make a small correction (deboosting) for it. This is done by finding the warmest point in the CMB, where a slight `blue-shift’ makes the CMB a tiny bit warmer. However, the same effect would be created by the motion of the solar system relative to the blast wave from Jupiter. The implication of this explanation is that the entire sky, full of tiny temperature anisotropies may not be the cosmic microwave background from the Big Bang at all, but merely the result of the recent blast on Jupiter. This cloud would likely have signs of polarization because of the powerful gravitational impulse from the blast, 5-6 AU distant, described in Greek myth as: “When Pallas Athene (Young Athene or Proto-Venus) was born, the Earth round about cried fearfully.” One advantage of this hypothesis is that it can be validated by the Juno probe due to begin detailed analyses of the interior of Jupiter in mid-2016, which, Cyclic Catastrophism maintains, will detect a nuclear furnace still burning in the Venus impact crater, creating the Great Red Spot and Jupiter’s temperature excess, which is limited to its atmosphere.

1 Cor 2:6-7  We do, however, speak a message of wisdom among the mature, but not the wisdom of this age or the rules of this age, who are coming to nought. No, we speak of God’s secret wisdom that has been hidden and that God destined for our glory before time began.

“Blessed are you when people insult you, persecute you and falsely say all kinds of evil against you because of me. Rejoice and be glad, because great is your reward in heaven, for in the same way they persecuted the prophets who were before you.”

Far Beyond the princes of The World

•September 12, 2014 • Leave a Comment

threeplanetsLast evening I decided to read from one of my library books – a choice of “The Theory of Everything” by Stephen Hawking or “Cycles of Time” by his associate Roger Penrose, both of whom rattle on interminably, imagining nonsensical, multiple universes, including dark matter and dark energy. Then, suddenly realizing how much more I have learned than these two dark ‘princes’ of the universes, decided to pick up my old Bible instead, which opened prophetically to 1 Corinthians 2.

“1 Corinthians 2:7  But we speak the wisdom of God in a mystery, even the hidden wisdom, which God ordained before the world unto our glory: Which none of the princes of this world knew: for had they known it, they would not have crucified the Lord of glory. But as it is written, Eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither have entered into the heart of man, the things [knowledge] which God hath prepared for them that love him.

We speak wisdom among them that are mature: yet not the wisdom of this world, nor of the princes of this world, that come to nought: But we speak of the secret wisdom of God, even the hidden wisdom, which God destined for our glory before time began. Now we have received, not the spirit of the world, but the spirit which is of God; that we might know the things that are freely given to us of God. But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned. The spiritual man makes judgements about all things, but he himself is not subject to any man’s judgement: For who has known the mind of the Lord, that he may instruct him.”

My little cyclic catastrophism epistles reveal the hidden knowledge of the Lord’s creation of mankind and his use of Mars, Venus and Mercury to prepare the Earth for our expansion over a period of 3,000 years.  As a result of His ‘opening of a door’, a great mass of cosmic knowledge has been revealed.  One-hundred amazing captures and releases of Mars (the number 100 having the Biblical meaning of completeness), and the knowledge they convey  concerning the cosmogony and makeup of the planets, are not presented herein to convince any of the ‘evolutionist’ (read athiest) scientists of the world, who are coming to nought.  Read Peleh: Hidden Knowledge, by John Ackerman.

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 45 other followers